Pushed it back as in not taking effect summer 2016???
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote: > That's correct, as I understood it. > > On Tuesday, February 23, 2016, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> OOBE rules have/are being modified so as to meet the intended DoD >> requirements but not hamstring the manufacturers with expensive filters >> etc. I believe they pushed back some or all of the implementation for a >> year. there was an explanation at last years wispapalooza on the technical >> details and i know steve coran posted some filings etc. to the list a while >> back. I think the FCC chose the UBNT method over the WISPA/JAB method. >> >> don't quote me on this tho...i might have just been drunk in vegas and >> dreamed all this up lol. >> >> -Sean >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Matt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Will the "next generation PMP 450 SM" have the same throughput and >>> range as the current standard PMP450 SM with a reflector dish in 5.8 >>> ghz band? Just concerned the new OOBE rules might reduce usefulness >>> of 5 ghz band for longer range PtmP and PTP? I am guessing they will >>> have some added filtering to meet the OOBE rules and just hoping this >>> does not reduce range terribly? 24 volt or 48 volt POE? It would be >>> nice if they worked on either voltage to make swap outs easier. Will >>> also slightly reduce cost of swapping power supplies. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Matt Mangriotis >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > YES! >>> > >>> > We are undertaking this project and working toward a next generation >>> PMP 450 >>> > SM that will cover the entire 5 GHz band (from 4.9-5.9 GHz), and be >>> less >>> > expensive than the 450i SM. >>> > >>> > At this point, I can’t comment on much surrounding the launch, as >>> we’ve only >>> > recently embarked down this path. >>> > >>> > Matt >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam Lambie >>> > Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 8:59 PM >>> > To: [email protected] >>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450i 5.1 and 5.2 non overlapping channels? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Thank you Matt. I appreciate the info. >>> > >>> > Are there any plans on creating 1 450 SM that can handle all 4 >>> frequencies? >>> > >>> > That would be super.... >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 3:30 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > No, the regular 450 is hardware limited to 5470-5900. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On 2/20/2016 3:55 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote: >>> > >>> > Will the 450 CPE work in 5.2? >>> > >>> > Jeff Broadwick >>> > >>> > ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >>> > >>> > 312-205-2519 Office >>> > >>> > 574-220-7826 Cell >>> > >>> > [email protected] >>> > >>> > >>> > On Feb 20, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Tushar Patel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Matt, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > To take advantage don't we need cheaper CPE? >>> > >>> > Tushar >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Feb 20, 2016, at 12:43 PM, Matt Mangriotis >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Didn’t see anyone answer you on this Sam. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > 5.1 GHz (UNII-1) is 100 MHz (5150-5250 MHz), and is not DFS >>> controlled, and >>> > follows similar rules to 5.8 GHz. This band is available in R14.1.1. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > 5.2 GHz (UNII-2) is also 100 MHz (5250-5350 MHz), but is a bit less >>> useful >>> > in that the max EIRP allowed is 30 dBm and it’s subject to DFS radar >>> > detection mechanisms. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Additional info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U-NII >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Taking advantage of these bands, however, can prove hugely useful and >>> > several of our customers are getting equipment deployed and working >>> soon. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > (Note: 5.2 and 5.4 will be supported in the R14.1.2 beta release that >>> will >>> > be out very soon). >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Matt >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam Lambie >>> > Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 4:54 PM >>> > To: [email protected] >>> > Subject: [AFMUG] 450i 5.1 and 5.2 non overlapping channels? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Is there any documentation or list knowledge on how big each frequency >>> is? >>> > >>> > Just wondering if it is worth it to go to the 450i and the ridiculously >>> > expensive SM's. >>> > >>> > We are running out of spectrum in 5.4 and 5.8 though. >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Sam Lambie >>> > Taosnet Wireless Tech. >>> > 575-758-7598 Office >>> > www.Taosnet.com >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Sam Lambie >>> > Taosnet Wireless Tech. >>> > 575-758-7598 Office >>> > www.Taosnet.com >>> >> >> > > -- > Regards, > Chuck >
