Something comes from nothing all the time.  Casimir effect. 
It is provable that there is a “nothing” with something in it.  

Non-locality proofs also lend support to the existence or at the very least the 
possibility of a God.  

Or you can go the multiverse direction.  If so best to study Heinlein and the 
Lazarus Long series.  

From: Cameron Crum 
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 10:17 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan

It doesn't have to be super-natural to assume something came from somewhere 
does it? Something certainly didn't come from nothing...causality and all. 


On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

  You cannot apply “objective” if the supernatural is involved.  And I mean 
“supernatural” as not directly observable or measurable – as in above nature or 
outside nature.  

  If  we live in the matrix, it is a bit of a wasted effort in speculating as 
to what is really going on.  But it is fun.  

  From: Cameron Crum 
  Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 11:28 PM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan

  Chuck, you can get to the same conclusion with simple logic and objective 
morality based on natural law. I'm happy to elaborate with sources for anyone 
who cares to listen. To the peanut gallery, please don't start a lecture on 
morality if you don't understand the word objective. Most of the time when I 
enter into these discussions, "Your morality is not my morality speech." That 
would be subjective morality, not objective. 

  On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

    No offense meant, I just like kicking around the philosophy ball with folks 
that have opposing points of view.  Only way I learn things.  

    From: Josh Reynolds 
    Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 10:57 PM
    To: [email protected] 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan

    I'm pulling back from this discussion. It's a no-win, and there are other 
hills I'd rather die on.

    Picking my battles so to speak.

    On Mar 13, 2016 11:50 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:

      If I have a strong feeling that the guy in the sky that created all of us 
hates the murder of babies, yes I will try to stop that via legislation.  How 
is that persecution?  Just trying to carry out the wishes of the boss.  He has 
promised me a pretty nice apartment if I give it a good try.  

      Persecution?

      From: Josh Reynolds 
      Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 10:46 PM
      To: [email protected] 
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan

      So you wish to force your religious beliefs on others via legislation, in 
a country created to escape persecution from religion?

      On Mar 13, 2016 11:38 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:

        Here is why a churches need to be involved with reproductive care, 
contraception, or abortion.

        If you believe there is a God, Creator, Savior etc.
        >Then if you believe that entity cares about these things (listed 
above).
        >>Then if you believe that the mind of that entity has communicated its 
wishes with man.
        >>>Then if you believe that those wishes are contained in doctrine of 
churches or bodies of scripture.
        >>>>Then the church and its doctrine trumps all laws of man.  
        The church needs to be involved in all facets of life.  If you believe 
the above.

        You can claim to be agnostic or atheistic but a smart person should 
hedge their bets against actually not knowing that they are totally right about 
that.   Could be that every time you eat spaghetti you are committing a mortal 
sin.  Could be.  

        For me and mine, I will take my particular flavor of Christianity and 
do my thing, while you do your thing.  
        But if I have an opportunity to legislate away things I consider mortal 
sins, I will try.  





        From: Josh Reynolds 
        Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 6:54 PM
        To: [email protected] 
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan

        Why does any church need to be involved with reproductive care, 
contraception, or abortion?

        Those are medical issues.

        On Mar 13, 2016 6:48 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" <[email protected]> 
wrote:


          Actually, my belief is here in the deep south we have a church on 
every corner.  Let the churches handle it....they are more than capable.

          My tax dollars aren't needed for this. (or many other things)

            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: Ken Hohhof 
            To: [email protected] 
            Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 6:18 PM
            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan

            What many people who lose sleep over Planned Parenthood are 
actually upset about is they offer birth control.  Some people obsess about 
poor people having sex without the punishment of getting pregnant.  See this if 
you forgot:

            
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh%E2%80%93Sandra_Fluke_controversy

            I don’t understand how you can be extremely anti-abortion yet also 
extremely anti-contraception.  Less unwanted pregnancies = less abortions.  
Which is the lesser evil?

            I think it comes down to some people are obsessed with sex, 
especially “other” people having sex.  #nosyneighbors #getalife


            From: Josh Reynolds 
            Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 5:48 PM
            To: [email protected] 
            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan

            Did you research that video? You should. It's not what you think.

            On Mar 13, 2016 5:41 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" 
<[email protected]> wrote:


              Yah, i'm kind of like Chuck here.

              I don't care about gay marriage.  I'm not gay, I know a handful 
of gay people.  Not my cup of tea but the government doesn't have any right 
telling them what they can or can't do.

              Same with adoption for a gay couple - shut up gov'mt.   Now, I'm 
not so sure on that.  When I was growing up there were few gay couples who had 
"come out" and we thought if the girl had a different last name than her mommy 
we thought that was odd.  Quite a bit different now but it could still screw 
with a kids head in terms of "traditional marriage".

              It would be hard to NOT state that traditional marriage has gone 
to hell in this country.  But then again, so many "traditional" things have 
gone to hell.  How many women stay at home and take care of the family while 
dad goes to work?

              I am in favor of defunding planned parenthood.  The videos pretty 
much got to me.  It's MY TAX DOLLARS.  Defund it.  There are plenty of other 
non-government-funded entities who can do that work.

              Any tax is bad :)

              I'm going to stop there, i will get in trouble... lol




                ----- Original Message ----- 
                From: Josh Reynolds 
                To: [email protected] 
                Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 5:02 PM
                Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan


                His stances:
                Gay marriage is wrong
                He doesn't support adoption for a gay couple
                Defund planned parenthood
                Raising corporate tax is bad
                Voted yes for more sentencing and prosecution for juveniles.
                Wants to drill in ANWR
                Voted no on tax credits for renewable energy.
                Voted no on 4 weeks paid parental leave for federal employees.
                Votes for PATRIOT act over and over
                Voted to allow warantless electronic surveillance against us 
citizens
                Denied additional funding that would provide expanded child 
healthcare
                "Let's build a fence!"
                Voted NO on reporting / deporting illegal immigrants who 
received hospital treatment

                Etc. A few things I like him on, but mostly he's a "nope" for 
me.

                On Mar 13, 2016 4:46 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote:

                  Hey, I said I liked him.  Just not full on man crush.

                  I didn’t see how his math added up for the budgets he 
proposed.  There were some missing pages where magic happened to balance the 
budget.  Seemed like the same old voodoo economics.

                  So “man crush”, is that like Trump and Putin?  At least Putin 
is supposedly an 8th degree black belt.  He would probably take care of the 
protester himself.  If Trump thinks he can bully the Putins of the world, I’m 
not so sure.  I think McCain could take him in a fair fight.  Hell, Bernie 
could probably take him.  I was never fond of Nixon, but the photo of the 
“kitchen debate” with Khrushchev is a treasure.
                  
http://spectator.org/articles/41740/how-handle-bully-nixon-vs-khrushchev



                  From: CBB - Jay Fuller 
                  Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 4:19 PM
                  To: [email protected] 
                  Subject: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan


                  I have actually followed Paul Ryan since the first time he 
appeared on the national stage.  Very impressed with him.  Could almost call 
him my "man crush".   I'd be interested in hearing what you do not like about 
him Ken.

                    ----- Original Message ----- 
                    From: Ken Hohhof 
                    To: [email protected] 
                    Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 2:04 PM
                    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Donald Trump's Supporters Love Him 
Even More AfterChicago Violence

                    I think the "establishment" is missing why people are fed 
up with them, I'm 
                    not convinced it's about left or right.  If I had to single 
out one person 
                    as the poster boy for why the establishment has failed us, 
it would be Mitch 
                    McConnell.  All 4 leaders in Congress have only been 
worried about their own 
                    power and re-election, but McConnell is the worst of a bad 
bunch.

                    I don't agree with Paul Ryan's economics or some of his 
politics, but I like 
                    what he has said since being elected Speaker.  I would like 
to see if they 
                    are just words, or if he would translate them into actions. 
 I don't think 
                    we will get to find out, election politics seem to have 
rendered him 
                    irrelevant.  And Mitch the Turtle would have to be replaced 
with someone 
                    actually interested in governing.  I wonder what 
conservative goals could 
                    have been accomplished in the 7 years Mitch has spent 
trying to make Obama 
                    fail no matter how much damage it causes.  Tort reform?  
Modifications to 
                    Obamacare?  Fix sequestration?  Tax reform?  Immigration 
reform?  Mitch 
                    doesn't care.  Mitch cares about Mitch.  That's the problem 
with the 
                    establishment, they spend all their effort on getting 
elected and staying in 
                    power, they don't even pretend to do their job.  And let me 
be clear, I'm 
                    not saying Pelosi, Reid and Boehner were much better, it's 
just McConnell is 
                    the most blatant hack of the bunch, every time I see him on 
TV I feel he is 
                    giving me the finger.

                    I am probably fooling myself that Paul Ryan would be 
different, but I don't 
                    think we'll find out.


                    -----Original Message----- 
                    From: Bill Prince
                    Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 1:40 PM
                    To: [email protected]
                    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Donald Trump's Supporters Love Him 
Even More After 
                    Chicago Violence

                    IMO, Obama moved right, and the Republicans moved further 
to the right.

                    bp
                    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

                    On 3/13/2016 6:01 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
                    > Obama moved right as much as the Republicans moved left. 
Everybody's idea 
                    > of compromise these days is you come to where I am and 
I'll make a deal.



Reply via email to