So am I reading this right? Say you have an aggregate of 40Mb/s AP capacity. Throw in a 450M and all of a sudden you have 160Mb/s without changing SM's?
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists <[email protected]> wrote: > Beta testing this summer. Fall for general release. > > Jeff Broadwick > ConVergence Technologies, Inc. > 312-205-2519 Office > 574-220-7826 Cell > [email protected] > > On Mar 16, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Chris Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > > Chuck, you’re a little early. April Fools isn’t for another sixteen days. > > > > Chris Wright > > Network Administrator > > Velociter Wireless > > 209-838-1221 x115 > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Chuck McCown > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:45 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M > > > > I think this summer,not certain. > > > > *From:* Craig Schmaderer <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:29 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M > > > > when did they say the 450M access point was coming out, i plan on buying 8 > 450i radios next week <image001.png> my guess is don't hold my breath > right? > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Af <[email protected]> on behalf of George Skorup < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:59 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M > > > > How about this ass-umption. 4x4 MIMO? How about beam steering? > > On 3/16/2016 10:54 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: > > That would be an incorrect assumption… > > > > Matt > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Gino Villarini > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:53 AM > *To:* Animal Farm mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M > > > > So im assuming 4 streams @ 256qam 125 Mbps = 500 Mbps > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > > 450m increases AP capacity by letting the AP talk to multiple SMs at the > same time. I don’t think it increases throughput to an individual SM, that > is the same as now (but note 30 and 40 MHz channels coming on 450). 450m > is a new AP and antenna, it will work with existing 450 and 450i SMs. > > > > *From:* Craig Schmaderer <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:09 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M > > > > Have they said anything about a new cheaper sm that does the entire 5ghz > band and gb ethernet, otherwise a 450i is still going to be needed to take > advantage of that 500mb, even mu-mimo on 2 sms can only do 200mb? not 500mb > right? I think aaron gave a hint a few weeks back about a new sm. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Chuck McCown < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:45 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M > > > > Right but you can do +100 Mbps aggregate to a 450 SM. > > > > *From:* Gino Villarini <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:02 AM > > *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M > > > > 500 aggregated in the AP, not to SMs... ? > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > > ouch. > > > > On 3/16/2016 9:36 AM, Brian Sullivan wrote: > > Just like FSK? > > On 3/16/2016 7:40 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > > Backwards compatibility. > With existing 450 > > > > > > > > > > > >
