Is there any more info out there about the 450M? I am doing overlay planning to increase capacity and it would suck to do al the work to add additional mounts when I could just swap out APs in August...
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > Not sure why you only have 40 Mbps capacity, are you talking 10 MHz > channels? > > Anyway, sounds like it uses MU-MIMO and beamforming and works best in a > dense environment, I assume because then you have lots of busy SMs > throughout the sector and it can aim at several at once. If you have 10 > SMs and they are all at the same azimuth, probably don’t gain much? > > *From:* Ryan Ray <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 2:48 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M > > So am I reading this right? Say you have an aggregate of 40Mb/s AP > capacity. Throw in a 450M and all of a sudden you have 160Mb/s without > changing SM's? > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Beta testing this summer. Fall for general release. >> >> Jeff Broadwick >> ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >> 312-205-2519 Office >> 574-220-7826 Cell >> [email protected] >> >> On Mar 16, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Chris Wright <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Chuck, you’re a little early. April Fools isn’t for another sixteen days. >> >> >> >> Chris Wright >> >> Network Administrator >> >> Velociter Wireless >> >> 209-838-1221 x115 >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Chuck McCown >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:45 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M >> >> >> >> I think this summer,not certain. >> >> >> >> *From:* Craig Schmaderer <[email protected]> >> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:29 AM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M >> >> >> >> when did they say the 450M access point was coming out, i plan on buying >> 8 450i radios next week <image001.png> my guess is don't hold my breath >> right? >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Af <[email protected]> on behalf of George Skorup < >> [email protected]> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:59 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M >> >> >> >> How about this ass-umption. 4x4 MIMO? How about beam steering? >> >> On 3/16/2016 10:54 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: >> >> That would be an incorrect assumption… >> >> >> >> Matt >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Gino Villarini >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:53 AM >> *To:* Animal Farm mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M >> >> >> >> So im assuming 4 streams @ 256qam 125 Mbps = 500 Mbps >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> 450m increases AP capacity by letting the AP talk to multiple SMs at the >> same time. I don’t think it increases throughput to an individual SM, that >> is the same as now (but note 30 and 40 MHz channels coming on 450). 450m >> is a new AP and antenna, it will work with existing 450 and 450i SMs. >> >> >> >> *From:* Craig Schmaderer <[email protected]> >> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:09 AM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M >> >> >> >> Have they said anything about a new cheaper sm that does the entire 5ghz >> band and gb ethernet, otherwise a 450i is still going to be needed to take >> advantage of that 500mb, even mu-mimo on 2 sms can only do 200mb? not 500mb >> right? I think aaron gave a hint a few weeks back about a new sm. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Chuck McCown < >> [email protected]> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:45 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M >> >> >> >> Right but you can do +100 Mbps aggregate to a 450 SM. >> >> >> >> *From:* Gino Villarini <[email protected]> >> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:02 AM >> >> *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M >> >> >> >> 500 aggregated in the AP, not to SMs... ? >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> ouch. >> >> >> >> On 3/16/2016 9:36 AM, Brian Sullivan wrote: >> >> Just like FSK? >> >> On 3/16/2016 7:40 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: >> >> Backwards compatibility. >> With existing 450 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- Carl Peterson *PORT NETWORKS* 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 Baltimore, MD 21202 (410) 637-3707
