So im assuming 4 streams @ 256qam 125 Mbps = 500 Mbps On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
> 450m increases AP capacity by letting the AP talk to multiple SMs at the > same time. I don’t think it increases throughput to an individual SM, that > is the same as now (but note 30 and 40 MHz channels coming on 450). 450m > is a new AP and antenna, it will work with existing 450 and 450i SMs. > > *From:* Craig Schmaderer <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:09 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M > > > Have they said anything about a new cheaper sm that does the entire 5ghz > band and gb ethernet, otherwise a 450i is still going to be needed to take > advantage of that 500mb, even mu-mimo on 2 sms can only do 200mb? not 500mb > right? I think aaron gave a hint a few weeks back about a new sm. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Chuck McCown < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:45 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M > > Right but you can do +100 Mbps aggregate to a 450 SM. > > *From:* Gino Villarini <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:02 AM > *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M > > 500 aggregated in the AP, not to SMs... ? > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ouch. >> >> >> On 3/16/2016 9:36 AM, Brian Sullivan wrote: >> >>> Just like FSK? >>> >>> On 3/16/2016 7:40 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: >>> >>>> Backwards compatibility. >>>> With existing 450 >>>> >>> >>> >> >
