How about this ass-umption. 4x4 MIMO? How about beam steering?

On 3/16/2016 10:54 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:

That would be an incorrect assumption…

Matt

*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Gino Villarini
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:53 AM
*To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M

So im assuming 4 streams @ 256qam 125 Mbps = 500 Mbps

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    450m increases AP capacity by letting the AP talk to multiple SMs
    at the same time.  I don’t think it increases throughput to an
    individual SM, that is the same as now (but note 30 and 40 MHz
    channels coming on 450).  450m is a new AP and antenna, it will
    work with existing 450 and 450i SMs.

    *From:*Craig Schmaderer <mailto:[email protected]>

    *Sent:*Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:09 AM

    *To:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] 450M

    Have they said anything about a new cheaper sm that does the
    entire 5ghz band and gb ethernet, otherwise a 450i is still going
    to be needed to take advantage of that 500mb, even mu-mimo on 2
    sms can only do 200mb? not 500mb right?  I think aaron gave a hint
    a few weeks back about a new sm.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From:*Af <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on
    behalf of Chuck McCown <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:45 AM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M

    Right but you can do +100 Mbps aggregate to a 450 SM.

    *From:*Gino Villarini <mailto:[email protected]>

    *Sent:*Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:02 AM

    *To:*Animal Farm <mailto:[email protected]>

    *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] 450M

    500 aggregated in the AP, not to SMs... ?

    On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        ouch.



        On 3/16/2016 9:36 AM, Brian Sullivan wrote:

            Just like FSK?

            On 3/16/2016 7:40 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

                Backwards compatibility.
                With existing 450


Reply via email to