Setting aside the technical requirements of the position, the "SaaS" that you're describing wouldn't eliminate the question of whose employee it is. Most likely, this person is your employee (as well as the service organization's employee) for most purposes.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:50 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > crickets? > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:15 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The subcontractor question comes up quite often. >> >> If an organization offered a subcontractor service (eliminates the >> question of whether its your employee are not, the subcontractor is >> provided as a service from the organization, its their problem whether its >> an employee or not, not yours), what would the ideal scenario be? >> >> minimum required skills, company representation, scheduling, ability to >> utilize your management system, time commitments, minimum >> availability/responsiveness, quality of work, insurance/bonding, etc. >> >> Assuming the organization also offered other industry beneficial services >> (contracted tower crew, fiber splicing, Tower/site inspection and >> mitigation recomendations, climber certification, etc) >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
