No, not me. Though I am occasionally a subcontractor to the company looking into this.
We are contracting a company for infrastructure (project based) work rather than rehiring exiting staff. He is considering offering installations as a service as a component of his structure. Neither one of us see it as financially viable, but its an avenue worth investigating. In all likelihood this would be a loss-leader for maintaining relationships with providers. If the individual installations are treated as a project, then a WISP is simply contracting his company to complete the project. Financials aside, he wants to know what the requirements would be. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Doug Hass <[email protected]> wrote: > You're not really describing a subcontractor/contractor service, but more > of a temp agency/temp employee service. If what you envision is starting a > company to provide these services to other businesses, that's something > different, but I what you're describing seems a bit different. > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:02 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Can you detail that out further, Doug? >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Doug Hass <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Setting aside the technical requirements of the position, the "SaaS" >>> that you're describing wouldn't eliminate the question of whose employee it >>> is. Most likely, this person is your employee (as well as the service >>> organization's employee) for most purposes. >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:50 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> crickets? >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:15 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The subcontractor question comes up quite often. >>>>> >>>>> If an organization offered a subcontractor service (eliminates the >>>>> question of whether its your employee are not, the subcontractor is >>>>> provided as a service from the organization, its their problem whether its >>>>> an employee or not, not yours), what would the ideal scenario be? >>>>> >>>>> minimum required skills, company representation, scheduling, ability >>>>> to utilize your management system, time commitments, minimum >>>>> availability/responsiveness, quality of work, insurance/bonding, etc. >>>>> >>>>> Assuming the organization also offered other industry beneficial >>>>> services (contracted tower crew, fiber splicing, Tower/site inspection and >>>>> mitigation recomendations, climber certification, etc) >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
