You're not really describing a subcontractor/contractor service, but more of a temp agency/temp employee service. If what you envision is starting a company to provide these services to other businesses, that's something different, but I what you're describing seems a bit different.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:02 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > Can you detail that out further, Doug? > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Doug Hass <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Setting aside the technical requirements of the position, the "SaaS" that >> you're describing wouldn't eliminate the question of whose employee it is. >> Most likely, this person is your employee (as well as the service >> organization's employee) for most purposes. >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:50 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> crickets? >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:15 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> The subcontractor question comes up quite often. >>>> >>>> If an organization offered a subcontractor service (eliminates the >>>> question of whether its your employee are not, the subcontractor is >>>> provided as a service from the organization, its their problem whether its >>>> an employee or not, not yours), what would the ideal scenario be? >>>> >>>> minimum required skills, company representation, scheduling, ability to >>>> utilize your management system, time commitments, minimum >>>> availability/responsiveness, quality of work, insurance/bonding, etc. >>>> >>>> Assuming the organization also offered other industry beneficial >>>> services (contracted tower crew, fiber splicing, Tower/site inspection and >>>> mitigation recomendations, climber certification, etc) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
