Can you detail that out further, Doug? On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Doug Hass <[email protected]> wrote:
> Setting aside the technical requirements of the position, the "SaaS" that > you're describing wouldn't eliminate the question of whose employee it is. > Most likely, this person is your employee (as well as the service > organization's employee) for most purposes. > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:50 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> crickets? >> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:15 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The subcontractor question comes up quite often. >>> >>> If an organization offered a subcontractor service (eliminates the >>> question of whether its your employee are not, the subcontractor is >>> provided as a service from the organization, its their problem whether its >>> an employee or not, not yours), what would the ideal scenario be? >>> >>> minimum required skills, company representation, scheduling, ability to >>> utilize your management system, time commitments, minimum >>> availability/responsiveness, quality of work, insurance/bonding, etc. >>> >>> Assuming the organization also offered other industry beneficial >>> services (contracted tower crew, fiber splicing, Tower/site inspection and >>> mitigation recomendations, climber certification, etc) >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
