What does 5 MHz have to do with polling interval and RRD step size? On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:11 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote:
> we have 5mhz > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What is your SNMP polling interval on that and RRD step size? If you're >> seeing peaks of 35 Mbps, I bet that your microburst peaks are actually >> around 55 Mbps but you're not seeing them due to >60 second polling. >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This is our most loaded 5Ghz ePMP AP: >>> >>> [image: Inline image 1] >>> >>> [image: Inline image 2] >>> >>> Users on this AP have plans from 1.5-10Mbps. >>> >>> I think it averages 70-80% of downlink frame usage during peak times, >>> but I don't have a graph available because Cambium won't expose this as a >>> percentage via SNMP (you have to look at the real-time value in the web >>> UI). >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> we are moving to epmp for cheap in 5ghz, the most populated ap only has >>>> like 12 users on 12/2 plans up to 8 miles, I dont see it scaling well >>>> compared to 450, but much better than the ubnt could ever dream. Its sync >>>> lets us do ABAB with no notable hit yet. >>>> 3ghz we are moving to 450 from a mix of ubnt shit and 320 garbage >>>> (though the 320 has been a beast) because the 1x gets us the edge of nlos >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> PMP450 is better. It will win the interference war. It will offer a >>>>> bit better bits/hz. If the revenue supports it, use it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Matt <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and >>>>>> some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far >>>>>> have not deployed more then couple test links. >>>>>> >>>>>> For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences >>>>>> you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? >>>>>> >>>>>> For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
