Umm, no? He asked about SNMP polling intervals. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:23 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote:
> he asked about guard band > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Indeed. 5 minute polling intervals (step = 300sec). I see real-time >> spikes in the ~60mbps range. >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> What is your SNMP polling interval on that and RRD step size? If you're >>> seeing peaks of 35 Mbps, I bet that your microburst peaks are actually >>> around 55 Mbps but you're not seeing them due to >60 second polling. >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> This is our most loaded 5Ghz ePMP AP: >>>> >>>> [image: Inline image 1] >>>> >>>> [image: Inline image 2] >>>> >>>> Users on this AP have plans from 1.5-10Mbps. >>>> >>>> I think it averages 70-80% of downlink frame usage during peak times, >>>> but I don't have a graph available because Cambium won't expose this as a >>>> percentage via SNMP (you have to look at the real-time value in the web >>>> UI). >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> we are moving to epmp for cheap in 5ghz, the most populated ap only >>>>> has like 12 users on 12/2 plans up to 8 miles, I dont see it scaling well >>>>> compared to 450, but much better than the ubnt could ever dream. Its sync >>>>> lets us do ABAB with no notable hit yet. >>>>> 3ghz we are moving to 450 from a mix of ubnt shit and 320 garbage >>>>> (though the 320 has been a beast) because the 1x gets us the edge of nlos >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> PMP450 is better. It will win the interference war. It will offer a >>>>>> bit better bits/hz. If the revenue supports it, use it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Matt <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far >>>>>>> have not deployed more then couple test links. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the >>>>>>> differences >>>>>>> you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the >>>>>>> reasoning? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
