Indeed. 5 minute polling intervals (step = 300sec). I see real-time spikes in the ~60mbps range.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: > What is your SNMP polling interval on that and RRD step size? If you're > seeing peaks of 35 Mbps, I bet that your microburst peaks are actually > around 55 Mbps but you're not seeing them due to >60 second polling. > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is our most loaded 5Ghz ePMP AP: >> >> [image: Inline image 1] >> >> [image: Inline image 2] >> >> Users on this AP have plans from 1.5-10Mbps. >> >> I think it averages 70-80% of downlink frame usage during peak times, but >> I don't have a graph available because Cambium won't expose this as a >> percentage via SNMP (you have to look at the real-time value in the web >> UI). >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> we are moving to epmp for cheap in 5ghz, the most populated ap only has >>> like 12 users on 12/2 plans up to 8 miles, I dont see it scaling well >>> compared to 450, but much better than the ubnt could ever dream. Its sync >>> lets us do ABAB with no notable hit yet. >>> 3ghz we are moving to 450 from a mix of ubnt shit and 320 garbage >>> (though the 320 has been a beast) because the 1x gets us the edge of nlos >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> PMP450 is better. It will win the interference war. It will offer a >>>> bit better bits/hz. If the revenue supports it, use it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Matt <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and >>>>> some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far >>>>> have not deployed more then couple test links. >>>>> >>>>> For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences >>>>> you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? >>>>> >>>>> For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> >
