i guess it could be something like that...but are they not both limited
to regional maximum if one checks the calculate EIRP limit in the ubnt
gear? And sets the correct antenna gain of course...
On 6/5/2016 3:58 PM, Colin Stanners wrote:
Is it possible the ePMP tx power is at the regional maximum while the
ubiquiti tx power was at the hardware maximum?
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Jerry Head <li...@blountbroadband.com
<mailto:li...@blountbroadband.com>> wrote:
RSSI?
4-7dBm
On 6/5/2016 1:17 PM, Jay Weekley wrote:
What was the average signal difference?
Jerry Head wrote:
It absolutely does perform worse on the same link, we just
helped a friend move an entire site from UBNT to epmp to
make use of the sync capabilities. We actually had to
transfer about 15% of the customers to 900 because they
would not work at all on epmp.
On 6/2/2016 4:31 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
But does it actually perform worse that UBNT 2.4ghz on
the same link, or is it maybe just differences in how
they calculate signal levels? It doesn't make any
sense that two different radios running on the same
frequency putting the same amount of power into the
same antennas would give significantly different
signal levels...
The closest thing I've done to a comparison was
playing with a Force 200 2.4ghz in wifi mode... there
didn't seem to be a significant difference between it
and a PowerBeam connecting to the same AP.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>>> wrote:
And I've tried IT Elite dual pol panels, Force 200
2.4,
integrated + reflector for CPEs. Continues to suck.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
<tel:937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
<tel:937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Ken Hohhof
<af...@kwisp.com <mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
I’m thinking more the CPE antennas.
*From:* CBB - Jay Fuller
<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net
<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>>
*Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:59 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
hmm, i will check into that. Pretty sure with
ubnt we're
using kp performance. With epmp, i think it
is bundled
antennas...
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Ken Hohhof <mailto:af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>>
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
<mailto:af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
*Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:50 PM
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
Jay, I suspect the difference you are
seeing may be
mainly in the antennas. 2.4 GHz from any
vendor should
penetrate the same, the radio waves don’t
care what brand
radio launched them. And I think the
difference between
the platforms will be most evident in low
interference
environment where they can achieve their
full modulation
and throughput. With low SNR, I think it’s
kind of like
arguing Ferrari vs Porsche for off road
racing, neither
will be able to show off its capabilities.
Receiver
sensitivity and bits/sec/Hz won’t matter.
*From:* CBB - Jay Fuller
<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net
<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>>
*Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:28 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
Also interested in interference rejection
of the pmp450 - is there any (in 2.4)
we are getting better foliage penetration
with ubnt 2.4
than epmp 2.4 - - and from the performance of
the epmp 2.4 i wish wish wish it
penetrated better!
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Matt
<mailto:matt.mailingli...@gmail.com
<mailto:matt.mailingli...@gmail.com>>
*To:* af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com> <mailto:af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
*Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:25 PM
*Subject:* [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450
deployed. Some
Ubiquiti we tried and
some we inherited as well. Have some
ePMP we have
tested but so far
have not deployed more then couple
test links.
For those who have tried both ePMP and
PMP450 what
are the differences
you have seen in performance?
Interference tolerance
among others?
For those that have gone with PMP450
over ePMP what
was the reasoning?
