Is it possible the ePMP tx power is at the regional maximum while the ubiquiti tx power was at the hardware maximum?
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Jerry Head <li...@blountbroadband.com> wrote: > RSSI? > 4-7dBm > > > On 6/5/2016 1:17 PM, Jay Weekley wrote: > >> What was the average signal difference? >> >> Jerry Head wrote: >> >>> It absolutely does perform worse on the same link, we just helped a >>> friend move an entire site from UBNT to epmp to make use of the sync >>> capabilities. We actually had to transfer about 15% of the customers to 900 >>> because they would not work at all on epmp. >>> >>> On 6/2/2016 4:31 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>> >>>> But does it actually perform worse that UBNT 2.4ghz on the same link, >>>> or is it maybe just differences in how they calculate signal levels? It >>>> doesn't make any sense that two different radios running on the same >>>> frequency putting the same amount of power into the same antennas would >>>> give significantly different signal levels... >>>> >>>> The closest thing I've done to a comparison was playing with a Force >>>> 200 2.4ghz in wifi mode... there didn't seem to be a significant difference >>>> between it and a PowerBeam connecting to the same AP. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> And I've tried IT Elite dual pol panels, Force 200 2.4, >>>> integrated + reflector for CPEs. Continues to suck. >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I’m thinking more the CPE antennas. >>>> *From:* CBB - Jay Fuller <mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net> >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:59 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >>>> hmm, i will check into that. Pretty sure with ubnt we're >>>> using kp performance. With epmp, i think it is bundled >>>> antennas... >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> *From:* Ken Hohhof <mailto:af...@kwisp.com> >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:50 PM >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >>>> Jay, I suspect the difference you are seeing may be >>>> mainly in the antennas. 2.4 GHz from any vendor should >>>> penetrate the same, the radio waves don’t care what brand >>>> radio launched them. And I think the difference between >>>> the platforms will be most evident in low interference >>>> environment where they can achieve their full modulation >>>> and throughput. With low SNR, I think it’s kind of like >>>> arguing Ferrari vs Porsche for off road racing, neither >>>> will be able to show off its capabilities. Receiver >>>> sensitivity and bits/sec/Hz won’t matter. >>>> *From:* CBB - Jay Fuller <mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net> >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:28 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >>>> Also interested in interference rejection of the pmp450 >>>> - is there any (in 2.4) >>>> we are getting better foliage penetration with ubnt 2.4 >>>> than epmp 2.4 - - and from the performance of >>>> the epmp 2.4 i wish wish wish it penetrated better! >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> *From:* Matt <mailto:matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:25 PM >>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >>>> We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some >>>> Ubiquiti we tried and >>>> some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have >>>> tested but so far >>>> have not deployed more then couple test links. >>>> >>>> For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what >>>> are the differences >>>> you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance >>>> among others? >>>> >>>> For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what >>>> was the reasoning? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
