I am going to do the cheaper route first before throwing a load of money
at procera.
Ok, disclosure is not an issue. I just did not understand what I could
do and could not do as far as limitation goes.
Now its time to get to work and see what I can do to make things more
smooth.
Thanks much everyone
Dave
On 6/20/2016 10:49 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
I actually got comments from customers saying the network was running
smoother once I put rules in the Procera to limit streaming, updates,
etc. Biggest benefit is they can't max the connection out with any 1
service which allows them to do huge Apple updates while still
watching Netflix.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Faisal Imtiaz
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
"the whole limit per customer thing because of title 2 stuff."
Please try to gain a better and clear understanding of the
Regulatory Rules and Requirements...
They don't say, you cannot do it... They say you have to disclose
up front what you do, and you have to do it across the board....
i.e. you cannot discriminate between streaming from one provider
vs another content provider...or for one customer and not for
another... it is perfectly ok to regulate, limit, police/policy
video streaming, you just need to disclose it....
:)
Regards.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <tel:305%20663%205518%20x%20232>
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <tel:%28305%29663-5518> Option 2 or
Email: [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"David Milholen" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Monday, June 20, 2016 10:44:45 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] traffic priorities
Ive been on the fence about doing the whole limit per customer
thing because of title 2 stuff.
But from what I understand you just cant charge the content
provider for a faster pipe into your network. I could have it
wrong but I have to do what I need to
smooth out the traffic.
On 6/20/2016 5:13 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
Didn't you just get a Procera in?
Limit amount of total streaming media per customer IP to
whatever you feel is necessary. It actually helps the
overall experience of the customer as video won't max out
their entire connection. Do the same with software updates
like Apple, Microsoft, Xbox, etc.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:07 PM, David
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ok, ALL of the BORG
I need some insight on what I should do.
Currently a majority of our network is routed,static
and ospf.
We keep a good lock down on our edge routers for bad
stuff but
I am looking to prioritize traffic based on three groups.
Voice,Video and Data.
So my question is how should I prioritize Video?
A. Limit per customer account
B Limit per Customer Device
C. No Limit free for all.
Each customer has a QOS limitation set by our radios
with available burst.
Most of these QOS limitations have no issue with most
streaming customers but we have the
occasional larger family the blows the top off the
larger QOS package we have.
It got me to thinking about traffic priority levels.
Currently we cannot support a 4k stream unless we give
them a PTP link or have an Access point all to themselves.
We make it clear that we do not support streams over
20Mbs.
What is the best approach for such a mess LOL
Thanks
Dave
--
--
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com <http://www.mnwifi.com/>
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
--
--
