It works as expected here. On Jun 21, 2016 11:40 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> From the outside world to the LAN IP nothing. From my house (the same /23 > of publics) it does ping. > > From the wired side of the epmp radio I could not ping the RF interface > IP. Or anything farther away. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:33 AM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What about a traceroute from upstream to the SM LAN? Does it just die? >> >> On 6/21/2016 11:27 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> >> Static route from our router to the ePMP RF IP. RF IP is DHCP, tried >> static. >> >> Can't see the routing table on the SM....augh..... >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:22 AM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> How are you assigning it an IP on the wireless/WAN side? Maybe a default >>> route thing? And then an upstream route back to the LAN side of the SM? >>> >>> On 6/21/2016 11:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>> >>> NAT works on like 98% of our customers. Bridge works on the other 2%. >>> Router mode didn't seem to do it's job. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:13 AM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> No. Unless you mean NAT. I messed with NAT. Unexplained latency issues, >>>> so I switched that customer back to bridge. The first one I tried. Of >>>> course that was a couple releases ago. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/21/2016 10:38 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Has anyone used this? Doesn't seem to be working for me... >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
