Apologies. Looks like we are just using the NAT mode not router mode.. I just didn't realize it for whatever reason. I've got a lab setup for EPMP I can play with.. what are you trying to accomplish?
On Jun 22, 2016 7:36 AM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> wrote: > 2.6.2? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Jun 22, 2016 7:44 AM, "Joe Novak" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It works as expected here. >> On Jun 21, 2016 11:40 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> From the outside world to the LAN IP nothing. From my house (the same >>> /23 of publics) it does ping. >>> >>> From the wired side of the epmp radio I could not ping the RF interface >>> IP. Or anything farther away. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:33 AM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> What about a traceroute from upstream to the SM LAN? Does it just die? >>>> >>>> On 6/21/2016 11:27 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>> >>>> Static route from our router to the ePMP RF IP. RF IP is DHCP, tried >>>> static. >>>> >>>> Can't see the routing table on the SM....augh..... >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:22 AM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> How are you assigning it an IP on the wireless/WAN side? Maybe a >>>>> default route thing? And then an upstream route back to the LAN side of >>>>> the >>>>> SM? >>>>> >>>>> On 6/21/2016 11:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> NAT works on like 98% of our customers. Bridge works on the other >>>>> 2%. Router mode didn't seem to do it's job. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:13 AM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> No. Unless you mean NAT. I messed with NAT. Unexplained latency >>>>>> issues, so I switched that customer back to bridge. The first one I >>>>>> tried. >>>>>> Of course that was a couple releases ago. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/21/2016 10:38 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Has anyone used this? Doesn't seem to be working for me... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>
