Masquerade is s-nat.... On Jun 22, 2016 8:21 AM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Basically NAT with the masquerade off. I'm going to lab and work with > Cambium here in a bit. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Jun 22, 2016 9:10 AM, "Joe Novak" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Apologies. Looks like we are just using the NAT mode not router mode.. I >> just didn't realize it for whatever reason. I've got a lab setup for EPMP I >> can play with.. what are you trying to accomplish? >> >> >> On Jun 22, 2016 7:36 AM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> 2.6.2? >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Jun 22, 2016 7:44 AM, "Joe Novak" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It works as expected here. >>>> On Jun 21, 2016 11:40 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From the outside world to the LAN IP nothing. From my house (the same >>>>> /23 of publics) it does ping. >>>>> >>>>> From the wired side of the epmp radio I could not ping the RF >>>>> interface IP. Or anything farther away. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:33 AM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> What about a traceroute from upstream to the SM LAN? Does it just die? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/21/2016 11:27 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Static route from our router to the ePMP RF IP. RF IP is DHCP, tried >>>>>> static. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can't see the routing table on the SM....augh..... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:22 AM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> How are you assigning it an IP on the wireless/WAN side? Maybe a >>>>>>> default route thing? And then an upstream route back to the LAN side of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> SM? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/21/2016 11:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> NAT works on like 98% of our customers. Bridge works on the other >>>>>>> 2%. Router mode didn't seem to do it's job. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:13 AM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No. Unless you mean NAT. I messed with NAT. Unexplained latency >>>>>>>> issues, so I switched that customer back to bridge. The first one I >>>>>>>> tried. >>>>>>>> Of course that was a couple releases ago. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/21/2016 10:38 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Has anyone used this? Doesn't seem to be working for me... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>
