Why not push the shaping down to the radio, in addition to at the head-end?
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:00 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> wrote: > I want to account for the customer to customer traffic. the traffic has to > traverse the BMUs which are at the edges of the network (theyre just another > OSPF router) > > Without changing something, I dont see I can do it, especially where > redundant rings exist > > without specific manual QOS for each customer at the POP mikrotiks I also > cannot control the bandwidth between the customers if the traffic doesnt > pass the BMU > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Can you explain what you want to do another way? >> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:15 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I know this is bad form, and very wasteful >> > >> > We are bringing up a primary redundancy link today that will affect a >> > large >> > portion of the network. we dont have alot of customers who connect to >> > one >> > another. our accounting (powercode BMU) all takes place at our provider >> > edges. Is there a filtering trick within OSPF to make all our customer >> > traffic destined for our customer IP space traverse the network to the >> > edge >> > and back (same subnet excluded)? >> > >> > I would prefer this be the default action on our network with explicit >> > customer allowances. >> > >> > I cant see any way of doing this on a straight layer three OSPF network >> > if >> > the default route forces the traffic to traverse the router housing the >> > destination >> > >> > -- >> > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> > as >> > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
