i try to avoid manual CPE rate limiting, if our tech pool was bright, might be different
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not push the shaping down to the radio, in addition to at the head-end? > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:00 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I want to account for the customer to customer traffic. the traffic has > to > > traverse the BMUs which are at the edges of the network (theyre just > another > > OSPF router) > > > > Without changing something, I dont see I can do it, especially where > > redundant rings exist > > > > without specific manual QOS for each customer at the POP mikrotiks I also > > cannot control the bandwidth between the customers if the traffic doesnt > > pass the BMU > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Can you explain what you want to do another way? > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:15 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I know this is bad form, and very wasteful > >> > > >> > We are bringing up a primary redundancy link today that will affect a > >> > large > >> > portion of the network. we dont have alot of customers who connect to > >> > one > >> > another. our accounting (powercode BMU) all takes place at our > provider > >> > edges. Is there a filtering trick within OSPF to make all our customer > >> > traffic destined for our customer IP space traverse the network to the > >> > edge > >> > and back (same subnet excluded)? > >> > > >> > I would prefer this be the default action on our network with explicit > >> > customer allowances. > >> > > >> > I cant see any way of doing this on a straight layer three OSPF > network > >> > if > >> > the default route forces the traffic to traverse the router housing > the > >> > destination > >> > > >> > -- > >> > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your > team > >> > as > >> > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as > > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
