Your other option is push it down to the site router. Eventually you might end up with an ansible script that can make bandwidth changes at both the headend and on the site router to make things more manageable.
Centralize shaping is efficient from a management standpoint, it's not efficient from a load distribution and end-end control standpoint. Centralized management of shaping is the best of both worlds. On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:17 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> wrote: > i try to avoid manual CPE rate limiting, if our tech pool was bright, might > be different > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Why not push the shaping down to the radio, in addition to at the >> head-end? >> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:00 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I want to account for the customer to customer traffic. the traffic has >> > to >> > traverse the BMUs which are at the edges of the network (theyre just >> > another >> > OSPF router) >> > >> > Without changing something, I dont see I can do it, especially where >> > redundant rings exist >> > >> > without specific manual QOS for each customer at the POP mikrotiks I >> > also >> > cannot control the bandwidth between the customers if the traffic doesnt >> > pass the BMU >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Can you explain what you want to do another way? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:15 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I know this is bad form, and very wasteful >> >> > >> >> > We are bringing up a primary redundancy link today that will affect a >> >> > large >> >> > portion of the network. we dont have alot of customers who connect to >> >> > one >> >> > another. our accounting (powercode BMU) all takes place at our >> >> > provider >> >> > edges. Is there a filtering trick within OSPF to make all our >> >> > customer >> >> > traffic destined for our customer IP space traverse the network to >> >> > the >> >> > edge >> >> > and back (same subnet excluded)? >> >> > >> >> > I would prefer this be the default action on our network with >> >> > explicit >> >> > customer allowances. >> >> > >> >> > I cant see any way of doing this on a straight layer three OSPF >> >> > network >> >> > if >> >> > the default route forces the traffic to traverse the router housing >> >> > the >> >> > destination >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >> >> > team >> >> > as >> >> > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> > as >> > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
