I think they're a little ways away from imploding.

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Isn't Apple ready to implode?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Jul 14, 2016 4:37 PM, "Travis Johnson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You get what you pay for... I have always believed that, and used that as
>> my mentality during my WISP years. Seems to be working for Apple too. :)
>>
>> Travis
>>
>>
>> On 7/14/2016 1:42 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>>
>> That's my point in the opposite direction. If price were no object,
>> perhaps the whole world would have iPhones. Unfortunately for Apple, price
>> is an object, and most people in the world have gone the other way.
>>
>> I think it's the same thing for GoPro.
>>
>> If GoPro only wants to sell in the US, then fine. It's a big world out
>> there.
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>> On 7/14/2016 12:27 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>>
>> Sure, but the point is there are plenty of people that will buy something
>> just because of the brand, even if there are alternatives that are cheaper
>> and better (or at least that look better on paper).
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> 80% of the people in the world (not just the US) buy Android. iPhone is
>>> mainly a US phenomenon. First world problem I guess.
>>>
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/14/2016 12:03 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>
>>> Just playing devil's advocate here...your same logic would suggest no
>>> one ever buys an iPhone.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is a lot more competition in that space now, and many of the
>>>> competitors products are both pretty darn good, and a lot less expensive.
>>>> If I was in the market, I wouldn't automatically get a GoPro. Just sayin'
>>>> if I'm thinking that way, I'm betting a lot of other people are too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bp
>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/14/2016 11:54 AM, Travis Johnson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It won't matter if it's disruptive or not... it's coming from GoPro,
>>>>> who has a HUGE following. Everyone will want one and buy one as soon as
>>>>> they can... sales go through the roof, stock price goes up... sell your
>>>>> stock at that point.
>>>>>
>>>>> The stock was as high as $80+ per share in the last two years... it's
>>>>> at $12 today... surely it has room to grow to $15 - $20 per share. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Travis
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/14/2016 11:24 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If the drone is somewhat disruptive. Nobody has seen it yet and there
>>>>>> are a ton of drones out there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Travis Johnson
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 11:02 AM
>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] GPRO
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think Fitbit will be a good one... it would have to be a little
>>>>>> longer
>>>>>> term play... probably closer to 9-10 months... after the holiday
>>>>>> season
>>>>>> sales and they report their 4Q earnings. Of course, GPRO will probably
>>>>>> have similar results after they release their drone in time for
>>>>>> holiday
>>>>>> shopping. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Travis
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/14/2016 10:45 AM, Cassidy B. Larson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I bought in..now I'm debating how long to let it ride..  got any
>>>>>>> more hot tips? :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 2016, at 10:35 AM, Travis Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hopefully people that invested in GPRO when I suggested a few
>>>>>>>> months ago are making some money this week?? :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I still think it will go to $14-$15 over the next 3-4 months... but
>>>>>>>> you never want to get greedy with the stock market either... LOL
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Travis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to