yeah that is the GPON version. The AE and GPON versions are much more expensive then the ethernet version.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:19 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/291701444025?lpid=82&chn=ps&ul_noapp=true > was all that popped up in the google > I assumed that was it > > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No, it is in low $100 range. >> >> *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:59 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] consumer router with parental controls/timers >> >> 500 bucks? >> lol, lets clarify consumer >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Calix gigacenter 844E >>> >>> -Sean >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> seeing alot more overnight usage from kids forgetting to shutoff >>>> youtube and netflix causing heavy usage for customers. >>>> >>>> Is there a consumer (parent) friendly router out there thats got a >>>> simple interface for parents to set either timers or usage restrictions >>>> (consumption more than content) thats not a hardware piece of junk? >>>> >>>> Im not talking about "just run a script that does this while initiating >>>> a chron that does that" >>>> >>>> This is for our retail side, so supporting it is on them and the >>>> manufacturer, we dont support consumer routers anyway >>>> >>>> Also, recomending actual parenting is kind of out, its 2016, aint >>>> nobody got no time fo no parenting >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
