Better performance for larger homes, as a system.

On Sep 13, 2016 6:09 PM, "Jason McKemie" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> That's surprising, makes for an expensive barebones router!
>
> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Nope. Does not. Very bare bones.
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2016 4:47 PM, "Jason McKemie" <j.mckemie@veloxinetbroadband.
>> com> wrote:
>>
>>> I haven't used it, but I'd bet Amplifi has this functionality. Not cheap
>>> though.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Im looking for something our retail side (separate entityish to the ISP
>>>> side) can sell to customers like they do the junk routers they sell them
>>>> now we dont have to support
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Jason McKemie <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> IIRC, they were around $150 last time I checked.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> im just curious on pricing for a retail shop, ill forward the contact
>>>>>> on to them, thank you
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can forward your info to our sales engineer for Illinois if you'd
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2016 1:52 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> where do people get these
>>>>>>>> I did the account sign up deal with them, but i never put my actual
>>>>>>>> number in, got an email saying they would be verifying my contact info
>>>>>>>> first, sounds like manageengine BS to me
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> yeah that is the GPON version. The AE and GPON versions are much
>>>>>>>>> more expensive then the ethernet version.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:19 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/291701444025?lpid=82&chn=ps&ul_
>>>>>>>>>> noapp=true was all that popped up in the google
>>>>>>>>>> I assumed that was it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No, it is in low $100 range.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm
>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:59 AM
>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] consumer router with parental
>>>>>>>>>>> controls/timers
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 500 bucks?
>>>>>>>>>>> lol, lets clarify consumer
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Calix gigacenter 844E
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Sean
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> seeing alot more overnight usage from kids forgetting to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shutoff youtube and netflix causing heavy usage for customers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a consumer (parent) friendly router out there thats
>>>>>>>>>>>>> got a simple interface for parents to set either timers or usage
>>>>>>>>>>>>> restrictions (consumption more than content) thats not a hardware 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> piece of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> junk?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Im not talking about "just run a script that does this while
>>>>>>>>>>>>> initiating a chron that does that"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is for our retail side, so supporting it is on them and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the manufacturer, we dont support consumer routers anyway
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, recomending actual parenting is kind of out, its 2016,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> aint nobody got no time fo no parenting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the team.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
>>>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of 
>>>>>>>>>>> the team.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
>>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the 
>>>>>>>>>> team.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to