where do people get these I did the account sign up deal with them, but i never put my actual number in, got an email saying they would be verifying my contact info first, sounds like manageengine BS to me
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: > yeah that is the GPON version. The AE and GPON versions are much more > expensive then the ethernet version. > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:19 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/291701444025?lpid=82&chn=ps&ul_noapp=true >> was all that popped up in the google >> I assumed that was it >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> No, it is in low $100 range. >>> >>> *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:59 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] consumer router with parental controls/timers >>> >>> 500 bucks? >>> lol, lets clarify consumer >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Calix gigacenter 844E >>>> >>>> -Sean >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> seeing alot more overnight usage from kids forgetting to shutoff >>>>> youtube and netflix causing heavy usage for customers. >>>>> >>>>> Is there a consumer (parent) friendly router out there thats got a >>>>> simple interface for parents to set either timers or usage restrictions >>>>> (consumption more than content) thats not a hardware piece of junk? >>>>> >>>>> Im not talking about "just run a script that does this while >>>>> initiating a chron that does that" >>>>> >>>>> This is for our retail side, so supporting it is on them and the >>>>> manufacturer, we dont support consumer routers anyway >>>>> >>>>> Also, recomending actual parenting is kind of out, its 2016, aint >>>>> nobody got no time fo no parenting >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
