That's surprising, makes for an expensive barebones router! On Tuesday, September 13, 2016, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nope. Does not. Very bare bones. > > On Sep 13, 2016 4:47 PM, "Jason McKemie" <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> I haven't used it, but I'd bet Amplifi has this functionality. Not cheap >> though. >> >> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> Im looking for something our retail side (separate entityish to the ISP >>> side) can sell to customers like they do the junk routers they sell them >>> now we dont have to support >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Jason McKemie < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> IIRC, they were around $150 last time I checked. >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> im just curious on pricing for a retail shop, ill forward the contact >>>>> on to them, thank you >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I can forward your info to our sales engineer for Illinois if you'd >>>>>> like >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 13, 2016 1:52 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> where do people get these >>>>>>> I did the account sign up deal with them, but i never put my actual >>>>>>> number in, got an email saying they would be verifying my contact info >>>>>>> first, sounds like manageengine BS to me >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> yeah that is the GPON version. The AE and GPON versions are much >>>>>>>> more expensive then the ethernet version. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:19 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/291701444025?lpid=82&chn=ps&ul_ >>>>>>>>> noapp=true was all that popped up in the google >>>>>>>>> I assumed that was it >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No, it is in low $100 range. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm >>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:59 AM >>>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] consumer router with parental >>>>>>>>>> controls/timers >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 500 bucks? >>>>>>>>>> lol, lets clarify consumer >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Calix gigacenter 844E >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -Sean >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> seeing alot more overnight usage from kids forgetting to >>>>>>>>>>>> shutoff youtube and netflix causing heavy usage for customers. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a consumer (parent) friendly router out there thats >>>>>>>>>>>> got a simple interface for parents to set either timers or usage >>>>>>>>>>>> restrictions (consumption more than content) thats not a hardware >>>>>>>>>>>> piece of >>>>>>>>>>>> junk? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Im not talking about "just run a script that does this while >>>>>>>>>>>> initiating a chron that does that" >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is for our retail side, so supporting it is on them and >>>>>>>>>>>> the manufacturer, we dont support consumer routers anyway >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Also, recomending actual parenting is kind of out, its 2016, >>>>>>>>>>>> aint nobody got no time fo no parenting >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of >>>>>>>>>>>> the team. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>
