interesting, 300M not posible on any 450 platform.  Could be posible with
LTE Advance and Carrier Aggregation but you need huge chunks of Spectrum
for it ( aprox 60 mhz) So maybe its LTE-U?

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:

> cambium 450m
>
> http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/products/access/pmp-450m/
>
> -sean
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> What Medusa system are referring to?
>>
>> On Sep 21, 2016 12:30 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Right, up to 7x increase in throughput, but only if properly spaced in
>>> each of seven different beams.
>>>
>>> To Jeff's point, I know they were planning on increases, but I thought
>>> the initial version was just the 450i tech with the Mu-MIMO added.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: *"Forrest Christian (List Account)" <li...@packetflux.com>
>>> *To: *"af" <af@afmug.com>
>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, September 21, 2016 1:28:34 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Rise Broadband Speeds
>>>
>>> Actually it's more nuanced than that.
>>>
>>> Your per-subscriber speed will not change.    (Assuming they haven't
>>> added a higher-order modulation here, but I don't remember hearing that
>>> they did).
>>>
>>> What *is* happening is that the Medusa will permit numerous simultaneous
>>> subscriber streams at the same time, and on the same channel.  My
>>> recollection is 'up to 7 simultaneous subscribers', but I'm too lazy today
>>> to go look and verify.  Someone can correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>
>>> So, assuming everything is perfect, you can get 7x the throughput in the
>>> same channel width.   Reality is never perfect, and Cambium acknowledges
>>> this as well - the actual improvement will depend on the locations and path
>>> characteristics of your customers.   I suspect that we'll all be learning
>>> what customer spread works the best....
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> AFAIK, Medusa doesn't increase the capacity of any one sector, just
>>>> puts many sectors in one radio.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> *From: *"Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:35:10 PM
>>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Rise Broadband Speeds
>>>>
>>>> They are advertising 300 Mbps now.  Can the Medusa actually deliver
>>>> that?  What PMP APs and SMs can honestly deliver that?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>>> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>>> <http://facebook.com/packetflux>  <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to