So Baicells offers 2.5GHz and 3.5GHz versions which require a license or arrangement with spectrum holder of these bands? How are you guys testing these without investing in licenses or permits?
Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390 On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not? You can still use a 3rd party CPE.....but if you're bringing a > Baicells (or whatever) eNB into the mix then you'll need a separate EPC for > that. > > This was mentioned on the Telrad WISPA list a couple of weeks ago. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "SmarterBroadband" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: 10/4/2016 12:09:26 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? > > > Why would they do that. That is one of their selling points, being > standards based??? > > > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 04, 2016 1:43 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? > > > > You can use the CPE's in between them as far as I understand. > > What changed with Telrad in the newest release is you can't add a > non-Telrad base station to their EPC....which in turn means you can't use > their system to authenticate/authorize any CPE connected to that non-Telrad > BS. > > > > Ie: Telrad EPC requires Telrad BS, but other CPE are ok to use. > > > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: 10/3/2016 11:02:14 PM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? > > > > I believe Telrad did something to break interoperability "recently". > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Monday, October 3, 2016 10:00:38 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? > > Is Telrad and Baicells interoperable? Do cpes of both work with both BS? > Or is the decision for one of them final? I see pricing of baicells listed > by distributors so I guess they are cheaper than Telrad. > > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- > Von: Adam Moffett <[email protected]> > Datum: 03.10.2016 15:42 (GMT+01:00) > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? > > We're wrestling with the same question here. > > > > M365 is inconsistent. > > > > We're testing Telrad LTE. It's too soon to say much though. > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Sent: 10/3/2016 6:37:56 AM > > Subject: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? > > > > At the moment there are the following options: > > > > TDD LTE (Baicells / Telrad / Huawei) > > > > PMP450 (Cambium) > > > > WiMAX (Cambium/Purewave/Telrad) > > > > UBNT M365 (Ubiquity) > > > > WiMAX and UBNT do not have any development/future. TDD-LTE claims good > NLOS capabilities. PMP450 claims higher sector capacity with LOS (QAM256). > LTE claims Standards compatibility while there are not much options to > select between. Baicell seem to bring LTE costs down to the Level of PMP450 > while both are way above the level of wifi-based 5GHz systems. Baicell is > in a testing/beta stage phase. PMP450 may increase performance/NLOS > capability with cnMedusa next year. Not seen any announcements where > TDD-LTE implementations are heading to next year. > > > > We’re still running WiMAX for NLOS as there is no clear path where to go > > > > > >
