Baicells has a 3.65ghz version out that can still be used under the old
rules.

On Oct 4, 2016 12:09 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> wrote:

> So Baicells offers 2.5GHz and 3.5GHz versions which require a license or
> arrangement with spectrum holder of these bands?   How are you guys testing
> these without investing in licenses or permits?
>
> Jaime Solorza
> Wireless Systems Architect
> 915-861-1390
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Why not? You can still use a 3rd party CPE.....but if you're bringing a
>> Baicells (or whatever) eNB into the mix then you'll need a separate EPC for
>> that.
>>
>> This was mentioned on the Telrad WISPA list a couple of weeks ago.
>>
>>
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "SmarterBroadband" <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: 10/4/2016 12:09:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?
>>
>>
>> Why would they do that.  That is one of their selling points, being
>> standards based???
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 04, 2016 1:43 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?
>>
>>
>>
>> You can use the CPE's in between them as far as I understand.
>>
>> What changed with Telrad in the newest release is you can't add a
>> non-Telrad base station to their EPC....which in turn means you can't use
>> their system to authenticate/authorize any CPE connected to that non-Telrad
>> BS.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ie: Telrad EPC requires Telrad BS, but other CPE are ok to use.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------ Original Message ------
>>
>> From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]>
>>
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>> Sent: 10/3/2016 11:02:14 PM
>>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?
>>
>>
>>
>> I believe Telrad did something to break interoperability "recently".
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Monday, October 3, 2016 10:00:38 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?
>>
>> Is Telrad and Baicells interoperable? Do cpes of both work with both BS?
>> Or is the decision for one of them final? I see pricing of baicells listed
>> by distributors so I guess they are cheaper than Telrad.
>>
>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
>> Von: Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
>> Datum: 03.10.2016 15:42 (GMT+01:00)
>> An: [email protected]
>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?
>>
>> We're wrestling with the same question here.
>>
>>
>>
>> M365 is inconsistent.
>>
>>
>>
>> We're testing Telrad LTE.  It's too soon to say much though.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------ Original Message ------
>>
>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]>
>>
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>
>> Sent: 10/3/2016 6:37:56 AM
>>
>> Subject: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?
>>
>>
>>
>> At the moment there are the following options:
>>
>>
>>
>> TDD LTE (Baicells / Telrad / Huawei)
>>
>>
>>
>> PMP450 (Cambium)
>>
>>
>>
>> WiMAX (Cambium/Purewave/Telrad)
>>
>>
>>
>> UBNT M365 (Ubiquity)
>>
>>
>>
>> WiMAX and UBNT do not have any development/future. TDD-LTE claims good
>> NLOS capabilities. PMP450 claims higher sector capacity with LOS (QAM256).
>> LTE claims Standards compatibility while there are not much options to
>> select between. Baicell seem to bring LTE costs down to the Level of PMP450
>> while both are way above the level of wifi-based 5GHz systems. Baicell is
>> in a testing/beta stage phase. PMP450 may increase performance/NLOS
>> capability with cnMedusa next year. Not seen any announcements where
>> TDD-LTE implementations are heading to next year.
>>
>>
>>
>> We’re still running WiMAX for NLOS as there is no clear path where to go
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to