What is the pricing like on the Baicells gear? Are there recurring licensing costs?
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > Baicells has a 3.65ghz version out that can still be used under the old > rules. > > On Oct 4, 2016 12:09 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> So Baicells offers 2.5GHz and 3.5GHz versions which require a license or >> arrangement with spectrum holder of these bands? How are you guys testing >> these without investing in licenses or permits? >> >> Jaime Solorza >> Wireless Systems Architect >> 915-861-1390 >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Why not? You can still use a 3rd party CPE.....but if you're bringing a >>> Baicells (or whatever) eNB into the mix then you'll need a separate EPC for >>> that. >>> >>> This was mentioned on the Telrad WISPA list a couple of weeks ago. >>> >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> From: "SmarterBroadband" <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: 10/4/2016 12:09:26 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? >>> >>> >>> Why would they do that. That is one of their selling points, being >>> standards based??? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 04, 2016 1:43 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? >>> >>> >>> >>> You can use the CPE's in between them as far as I understand. >>> >>> What changed with Telrad in the newest release is you can't add a >>> non-Telrad base station to their EPC....which in turn means you can't use >>> their system to authenticate/authorize any CPE connected to that non-Telrad >>> BS. >>> >>> >>> >>> Ie: Telrad EPC requires Telrad BS, but other CPE are ok to use. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> >>> From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> >>> >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> Sent: 10/3/2016 11:02:14 PM >>> >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? >>> >>> >>> >>> I believe Telrad did something to break interoperability "recently". >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Monday, October 3, 2016 10:00:38 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? >>> >>> Is Telrad and Baicells interoperable? Do cpes of both work with both BS? >>> Or is the decision for one of them final? I see pricing of baicells listed >>> by distributors so I guess they are cheaper than Telrad. >>> >>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >>> Von: Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>> Datum: 03.10.2016 15:42 (GMT+01:00) >>> An: [email protected] >>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? >>> >>> We're wrestling with the same question here. >>> >>> >>> >>> M365 is inconsistent. >>> >>> >>> >>> We're testing Telrad LTE. It's too soon to say much though. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> >>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> >>> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> >>> Sent: 10/3/2016 6:37:56 AM >>> >>> Subject: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? >>> >>> >>> >>> At the moment there are the following options: >>> >>> >>> >>> TDD LTE (Baicells / Telrad / Huawei) >>> >>> >>> >>> PMP450 (Cambium) >>> >>> >>> >>> WiMAX (Cambium/Purewave/Telrad) >>> >>> >>> >>> UBNT M365 (Ubiquity) >>> >>> >>> >>> WiMAX and UBNT do not have any development/future. TDD-LTE claims good >>> NLOS capabilities. PMP450 claims higher sector capacity with LOS (QAM256). >>> LTE claims Standards compatibility while there are not much options to >>> select between. Baicell seem to bring LTE costs down to the Level of PMP450 >>> while both are way above the level of wifi-based 5GHz systems. Baicell is >>> in a testing/beta stage phase. PMP450 may increase performance/NLOS >>> capability with cnMedusa next year. Not seen any announcements where >>> TDD-LTE implementations are heading to next year. >>> >>> >>> >>> We’re still running WiMAX for NLOS as there is no clear path where to go >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>
