a mutt is a lowlife , and i wouldnt have called him that prior to this election, when he turned his position of authority into a political platform for demeaning the integrity of the election process he lost the privilege of his position (even after he blatantly lied to the american population and willfully fucked them with the aca and the lies like, you can keep your plan and your doctor, and the coverage i had prior at about 4800/year would have cost me 24k, so yeah, fuck him then too). I am not in the military, and Im glad im not, he turned his back on you a very long time ago. however if i was in the military i would not have called him the mutt he is, i would have kept my mouth shut as would have been my duty. I can think of may phrases much worse than calling someone a low life.
you talk about a commander in chief commanding respect when hes created and an environment where Janaye Ervin can sit and livestream herself sitting during the national anthem while on active duty and there is even a question of whether she is going to be disciplined. so as a civillian, yeah, hes a mutt On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > The first time I ignored it. > > The second time I did a double take and though "did he really just call > the President of the United States a MUTT?"!? > > As an American citizen, I'm ashamed of that and I didn't even say it. As a > combat veteran, that was my Commander-In-Chief - saying that in uniform, > regardless of the man or woman in office would get you court martialed and > kicked out of the military with a dishonorable discharge... Forever ruining > you chances at decent employment, amongst many other things. > > Like him or not, shame on you. That's as unAmerican a phrase as I can > think of, and lacks basic human decency. > > On Oct 19, 2016 10:32 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Rats run, the "establishment" is full of rats, so are swamps. Military >> personnel captured bin laden, the mutt in the whitehouse was playing >> spades, he didnt capture anybody, he didnt collect intelligence, he didnt >> build any of the infrastructure used to gather intel, he didnt build the >> operative system that was in play that led to the ability of our military >> personel to capture him. good job to him though for taking time out of his >> card game to give the go ahead. >> >> Have you not listened to a word he said, crime and drugs are the biggest >> issues he talks about coming over the border. Hes been very clear, lock >> down the border, get those here illegally out (i dont agree with this >> directly, and i dont suspect he will "break up families") once its secure, >> refocus resources on the completely fucked system that caused a 7 year >> process, streamline it so these people who didnt want to do the work to >> come in right the first time can get back in line, and maybe they wont have >> to wait as long. >> >> you think mexicans are the old bags priority? shit. they dont have any >> money, theyll be put out anyway at the end of the day by her, the money is >> in the ones that come from the sand >> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Jaime Solorza < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You called our president a mutt? Real patriot... Who the fuck got Bin >>> Laden? I have the balls to admit Hillary is not perfect... But Trump is a >>> fucking idiot... When have you seen so many Republicans distance themselves >>> from their nominee, even vote for other candidate? He doesn't know shit >>> about the border and our problems... Drugs are the main problem not poor >>> people who take the shit jobs you guys don't want to do.. No matter the >>> pay... Only farmers and ranchers born into it work as hard in heat and >>> tough conditions... And fact is many of these immigrants pay taxes....so >>> come to the border and see for yourselves the reality. Drugs are getting >>> in sometimes with help of border patrol for $$$$$...because of demand. No >>> demand, no supply... What no one, not even Obama or others has done is go >>> into these countries and eradicate the fields... We tried a bit in Columbia >>> but it should be an all out war... Our scientists know how to eliminate >>> cocaine and heroin(poppy) but we have to be politically correct. More? >>> >>> On Oct 19, 2016 8:56 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I seem to recall stuxnet was sourced to russia by those very same >>>> sources..... you know, until it turned out it was us and isreal >>>> >>>> I have no question russias involved, but spearheaded by putin directly? >>>> come on, did those 17 hack putins emails where he issued the orders? >>>> >>>> what happenned to china? before this election, all nefarious cybercrime >>>> was china with the exception of the identity/financial theft originating >>>> from russia. >>>> >>>> trump said hed make the us quit being chinas puppet and putin >>>> complimented trump, suddenly all things cyber are solely russian and only >>>> in favor of trump >>>> >>>> If i were putin, i would prefer a strong leader, strong leaders that >>>> are not allies but not enemies create global power. weak leaders like our >>>> current mutt cause irritations and weak leaders like hillary cause nuclear >>>> conflicts with wek and idle threats. no fly zone, but wont commit to >>>> shooting down violators.. no strength >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Jaime Solorza < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So 17 sources on Russian hacking are wrong and he is correct? >>>>> Didn't we arrest a Russian hacker in Europe today ? Of course in HIS >>>>> mind >>>>> he is smarter than our military and intelligence folks. >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 19, 2016 8:45 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> And ICE Did Not endorse him... Get the facts >>>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 19, 2016 8:42 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I will keep you in suspense. Wow >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2016 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He fucked himself with vote question... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2016 8:29 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Goes to character...cheat on wife cheat on all >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2016 8:13 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't know. I don't about laughing. I think they are likely >>>>>>>>>> shocked and fearful. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, 9:07 PM Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We have two lying, cheating, disrespectful sociopaths on stage >>>>>>>>>>> right now. Neither one can answer a straight question with a >>>>>>>>>>> straight >>>>>>>>>>> answer. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They BOTH likely belong in jail, not running for the highest >>>>>>>>>>> office in the United States. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This is terrible. Disgraceful. We are the laughing stock of the >>>>>>>>>>> world. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
