You respect the office, not the man or woman. I... I'm done. I don't think I want to be in any more discussion at all about this election or any others at this point on here.
What. The. Fuck. On Oct 19, 2016 11:29 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> wrote: > a mutt is a lowlife , and i wouldnt have called him that prior to this > election, when he turned his position of authority into a political > platform for demeaning the integrity of the election process he lost the > privilege of his position (even after he blatantly lied to the american > population and willfully fucked them with the aca and the lies like, you > can keep your plan and your doctor, and the coverage i had prior at about > 4800/year would have cost me 24k, so yeah, fuck him then too). I am not in > the military, and Im glad im not, he turned his back on you a very long > time ago. however if i was in the military i would not have called him the > mutt he is, i would have kept my mouth shut as would have been my duty. I > can think of may phrases much worse than calling someone a low life. > > you talk about a commander in chief commanding respect when hes created > and an environment where Janaye Ervin can sit and livestream herself > sitting during the national anthem while on active duty and there is even a > question of whether she is going to be disciplined. so as a civillian, > yeah, hes a mutt > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The first time I ignored it. >> >> The second time I did a double take and though "did he really just call >> the President of the United States a MUTT?"!? >> >> As an American citizen, I'm ashamed of that and I didn't even say it. As >> a combat veteran, that was my Commander-In-Chief - saying that in uniform, >> regardless of the man or woman in office would get you court martialed and >> kicked out of the military with a dishonorable discharge... Forever ruining >> you chances at decent employment, amongst many other things. >> >> Like him or not, shame on you. That's as unAmerican a phrase as I can >> think of, and lacks basic human decency. >> >> On Oct 19, 2016 10:32 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Rats run, the "establishment" is full of rats, so are swamps. Military >>> personnel captured bin laden, the mutt in the whitehouse was playing >>> spades, he didnt capture anybody, he didnt collect intelligence, he didnt >>> build any of the infrastructure used to gather intel, he didnt build the >>> operative system that was in play that led to the ability of our military >>> personel to capture him. good job to him though for taking time out of his >>> card game to give the go ahead. >>> >>> Have you not listened to a word he said, crime and drugs are the biggest >>> issues he talks about coming over the border. Hes been very clear, lock >>> down the border, get those here illegally out (i dont agree with this >>> directly, and i dont suspect he will "break up families") once its secure, >>> refocus resources on the completely fucked system that caused a 7 year >>> process, streamline it so these people who didnt want to do the work to >>> come in right the first time can get back in line, and maybe they wont have >>> to wait as long. >>> >>> you think mexicans are the old bags priority? shit. they dont have any >>> money, theyll be put out anyway at the end of the day by her, the money is >>> in the ones that come from the sand >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Jaime Solorza < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> You called our president a mutt? Real patriot... Who the fuck got Bin >>>> Laden? I have the balls to admit Hillary is not perfect... But Trump is a >>>> fucking idiot... When have you seen so many Republicans distance themselves >>>> from their nominee, even vote for other candidate? He doesn't know shit >>>> about the border and our problems... Drugs are the main problem not poor >>>> people who take the shit jobs you guys don't want to do.. No matter the >>>> pay... Only farmers and ranchers born into it work as hard in heat and >>>> tough conditions... And fact is many of these immigrants pay taxes....so >>>> come to the border and see for yourselves the reality. Drugs are getting >>>> in sometimes with help of border patrol for $$$$$...because of demand. No >>>> demand, no supply... What no one, not even Obama or others has done is go >>>> into these countries and eradicate the fields... We tried a bit in Columbia >>>> but it should be an all out war... Our scientists know how to eliminate >>>> cocaine and heroin(poppy) but we have to be politically correct. More? >>>> >>>> On Oct 19, 2016 8:56 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I seem to recall stuxnet was sourced to russia by those very same >>>>> sources..... you know, until it turned out it was us and isreal >>>>> >>>>> I have no question russias involved, but spearheaded by putin >>>>> directly? come on, did those 17 hack putins emails where he issued the >>>>> orders? >>>>> >>>>> what happenned to china? before this election, all nefarious >>>>> cybercrime was china with the exception of the identity/financial theft >>>>> originating from russia. >>>>> >>>>> trump said hed make the us quit being chinas puppet and putin >>>>> complimented trump, suddenly all things cyber are solely russian and only >>>>> in favor of trump >>>>> >>>>> If i were putin, i would prefer a strong leader, strong leaders that >>>>> are not allies but not enemies create global power. weak leaders like our >>>>> current mutt cause irritations and weak leaders like hillary cause nuclear >>>>> conflicts with wek and idle threats. no fly zone, but wont commit to >>>>> shooting down violators.. no strength >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Jaime Solorza < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So 17 sources on Russian hacking are wrong and he is correct? >>>>>> Didn't we arrest a Russian hacker in Europe today ? Of course in HIS >>>>>> mind >>>>>> he is smarter than our military and intelligence folks. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 19, 2016 8:45 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> And ICE Did Not endorse him... Get the facts >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2016 8:42 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will keep you in suspense. Wow >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2016 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> He fucked himself with vote question... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2016 8:29 PM, "Jaime Solorza" < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Goes to character...cheat on wife cheat on all >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2016 8:13 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't know. I don't about laughing. I think they are likely >>>>>>>>>>> shocked and fearful. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, 9:07 PM Josh Reynolds < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We have two lying, cheating, disrespectful sociopaths on stage >>>>>>>>>>>> right now. Neither one can answer a straight question with a >>>>>>>>>>>> straight >>>>>>>>>>>> answer. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> They BOTH likely belong in jail, not running for the highest >>>>>>>>>>>> office in the United States. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is terrible. Disgraceful. We are the laughing stock of the >>>>>>>>>>>> world. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
