My office is outside my wireless coverage, and has 15/2 AT&T UVerse. I guess it’s news to me that wouldn’t be enough for one person to work from home.
Comcast tends to be 10:1 asymmetric, so you need at least their 50M service to get 5M upload. So I think the idea that wherever you live, you just call up and order 20/5 service is unrealistic. Unfortunately, I’m seeing people sign up for Hughesnet because they are promising those sorts of speeds on their new satellite. My experience with remote session like VPN and Citrix, and video/voice networking tools like Skype and Google Hangouts and softphones, is that they care about the QUALITY of the connection more than the QUANTITY. If you have packet loss, or latency spikes, you are going to get “kicked out of” your VPN and Citrix sessions, and people will complain about video and audio quality when you try to jump on a conference call. From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Baird Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 9:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BW to work from home What? 20/5 (or less) is still very adequate for *lots* of users. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Roger Timmerman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Is this a re-run from 2005? Are we really talking about 20M/5M or less still being an option and being adequate? On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: That could be part of it. I work from home with 3m/1m. It's not uncommon to have a kid watching cartoons on Netflix while I'm working. The thing is, most of what I'm doing across the network is remote terminals and remote desktops. And I'm clever enough that when I need to transfer a large file to the office I'll use WinSCP and put a speed limit on the transfer so I can keep doing other things. Some people might start the big file transfer and then call IT because nothing else works now. I'm aware that there are people using some Autodesk cloud storage/versioning thing that integrates with AutoCAD....they were told to try to get 10meg upload if they can and I believe they might really use it. On 11/2/2016 12:25 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: I think a lot of it is just lazy IT guys not wanting to deal with people causing problems by watching Netflix on six TVs while they're trying to work, so they just tell them they need five times the speed they actually do. We've had customers that were told they needed something like 3Mbps upload, but were able to do their jobs perfectly fine on a plan with 1Mbps upload. On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Nope... Getting more common... My daughter needs good upstream to upload medical scans she does for several clinics and private doctors from house or retirement places. She had to upgrade plan from TWC to accommodate her. On Nov 1, 2016 9:52 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Twice in the past few weeks I’ve had prospective customers say they needed a minimum of 20M/5M per company IT dept to work from home, emphasis on the 5M upstream. This is a lot more than I’ve heard in the past, and seems high to me. In many cases even in town on cable Internet, they will need at least a plan with at least 50M download to get that much upload. My experience in the past has been that even our 3M/1M plan is actually sufficient for most people to work from home (assuming they aren’t contending with the rest of the family trying to watch Netflix and Youtube). Is this some kind of a trend, people needing that much upstream to work from home? Or just a coincidence I’ve had 2 requests like that in as many weeks.
