I would more say... incomplete information...We need to add "per pair" to that description.
The 450M does support sync over power, it just is different. On Nov 14, 2016 8:38 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: > For the record, http://store.packetflux.com/powerinjector-plus-sync- > gigabit-version/ says: 1A per port maximum power. (48 watts at 48 Volts) > > So.. is the electronic over-current protection the 1A limit? Or is this > just outdated info? Pretty sure it's >1A because I've "tested" it (cable > leaking water into the GigE-APC, the port didn't trip, and the card was hot > as hell). > > I was also unaware that Cambium won't be supporting sync-over-power on the > 450m. I imagine the ringing/bounce issue killed that idea due to the high > power consumption. > > On 11/14/2016 1:00 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: > > The current products should power the 450M just fine. The rating is 1A > per pair per port, so at the 48V you're good up to 96W. > > On Nov 14, 2016 7:50 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: > > The 450m pulls 70 watts. The current SyncInjector/PowerInjector+Sync is > around 1A max per port. What you could do for now is a GigE-POE-APC and the > new aux port version SyncBox Junior. > > > On 11/14/2016 12:34 PM, Matt wrote: > >> Shouldn't the sync over power for the 450M be the same as PMP450i? >> >> How is the 1u sync injector coming? >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> All of the currently shipping syncbox product line are compatible. For >>> sync >>> over power, I have the specs, but the design isn't done yet. >>> >>> >>> On Nov 14, 2016 5:40 PM, "Sam Lambie" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> A question for Forrest mostly. Have you come up with a timing product >>>> for >>>> the 450m AP yet? If not, have you got a timeline for release? >>>> >>>> Sam >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Sam Lambie >>>> Taosnet Wireless Tech. >>>> 575-758-7598 Office >>>> www.Taosnet.com >>>> >>> > > >
