would be neat to do it and look at the pair report on the af, just to see what it looks like, assuming the port isnt smoking
having the site monitor at every site is really a decent deal, for 99 bucks you get a temperature probe, a couple power monitors and a couple relays that are all IP controlled, theyre worth putting in even without syncinjectors imho with them you get a crap ton more versatility out of the injectors too On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> wrote: > Been using the injectors for 7 years without needing one yet. I'm not > opposed to them though, Just looking for a quick solution fast here to > power some Airfibers > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You should really use SiteMonitors if you use SyncInjectors. It allows >> you to manage and monitor the SyncInjector. >> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Kurt Fankhauser < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I just received my first powerinjector + sync today. If I want to power >>> some Airfibers with these do I need to turn the sync off for those ports? I >>> don't see a jumper to turn off sync, is it ok to provider sync on a port >>> with an Airfiber? Does it hurt anything? It looks to me like the only way >>> to turn off sync is buy the additional site monitor base thing to hookup to >>> it and turn it off through the web interface? >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:39 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I have four 5GHz 450i's running on our office tower fed from a GigE >>>> PowerInjector+Sync. They're running 14.1.2. They received sync shortly >>>> after boot, DFS, etc. BTW, no GigE-APC's in line on these yet. I'm like two >>>> short at the moment. But we know that 1000Base-T and sync over power + the >>>> older APC's don't play nice anyway. >>>> >>>> On 11/21/2016 1:23 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>>> >>>> I've had a couple of them where I wasn't getting sync and couldn't >>>> figure out why... in one case (maybe both... I don't remember off hand), I >>>> was getting sync to an ePMP, but not to a PMP450i 900mhz AP that were both >>>> plugged into the same sync injector... I didn't really need sync on the >>>> 900mhz at the time, so I just switched it to generate it's own timing, and >>>> I haven't gotten around to trying to figure it out yet, but now I'm >>>> wondering if it would eventually come up if I left it alone. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/21/16 10:39, [email protected] wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I had all the packet flux gear running for days, plugged in the 450i >>>>>> and >>>>>> started trying to figure out why it was not receiving sync. Half hour >>>>>> or more later it said it was OK, so the delay had to be Cambium, not >>>>>> Packetflux. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Check if the packetflux says it has fix and 1PPS is active on the >>>>> binary tab and that the used pulse count is increasing on the analog tab. >>>>> >>>>> ~Seth >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
