"just like cord cutting, and all the newest bestest greenest, efficientest,
its always on somebody elses back"

 - capitalism

Although you could replace from cord cutting to efficientest with
"everything" and it would be "samesies"

On Dec 4, 2016 5:53 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> capitalism has no mandate to offset others costs through forcible taxation
> that im aware. unless we are talking about the exchange of responsibilities
> via voluntary taxation of mileage in exchange for access to group resources
> like federal taxes. still not sure id call that strict capitalism
>
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> You realize what you just described in the strictest sense is called
>> capitalism, right?
>>
>> On Dec 4, 2016 3:41 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> just like cord cutting, and all the newest bestest greenest,
>>> efficientest, its always on somebody elses back. if its regulation you
>>> want, its regulation you get...to get any, even a single penny, subsidy for
>>> "green tech, youre required to come to the dmv twice a yer for an odometer
>>> reading and tax form for you to pay your taxes. your vehicle has a huge
>>> environmental liability with the batteries (this should make the climate
>>> changers cream) so if you dont register a sale of the electric car, and
>>> dont get your odometer read, then you just get an annual tax bill for
>>> 250,000 miles
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Brian Webster <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Imagine the motorhome also having a solar powered hydrogen fuel cell to
>>>> either make the hydrogen or have enough power to recharge the batteries.
>>>> Depending on how far you can go just on batteries and how long it takes to
>>>> recharge on solar, you could pace your travels to be darn near free 
>>>> driving.
>>>>
>>>> The one thing that governments are starting to struggle with now is the
>>>> road taxes that are technically owed. Right now they collect it as the
>>>> gas/fuel pump for every gallon of fuel you purchase. I know in NY state
>>>> technically if you own an electric car you are supposed to calculate your
>>>> mileage driven on electric and then enter that on your tax return to
>>>> calculate how much you owe in road taxes that you did not pay at a gas
>>>> pump. I am sure that is honestly reported by citizens just like they are
>>>> supposed to report all of their on line purchases that did not have NY
>>>> state sales taxes collected.......
>>>>
>>>> Thank You,
>>>> Brian Webster
>>>> www.wirelessmapping.com
>>>> www.Broadband-Mapping.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Andrews
>>>> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 6:39 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 1000hp, 1,200mile range truck - hydrogen
>>>>
>>>> This is what I want for a motor home, along with autopilot a la tesla...
>>>>   The easiest way to see north america as possible...
>>>>
>>>> On 12/02/2016 03:35 PM, George Skorup wrote:
>>>> > I would really like to see passenger vehicles and small trucks go
>>>> > hybrid hydrogen/electric. Even better would be an any-fuel hybrid
>>>> electric.
>>>> > Hydrogen, propane or NG and a regular gas tank for reserve. Either
>>>> > that, or a gas turbine like an M1 Abrams that can burn anything, but
>>>> > it would obviously need to get better fuel economy than 5 gallons per
>>>> mile.
>>>> >
>>>> > On 12/2/2016 4:49 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Nikola Motor Company reveals hydrogen fuel cell truck with range of
>>>> >> 1,200 miles -
>>>> >> http://arstechnica.co.uk/cars/2016/12/nikola-hydrogen-fuel-c
>>>> ell-truck
>>>> >> /
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Reply via email to