Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house website. The bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended inauguration.... Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised. Let me Trumpspeak... So sad.
On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> wrote: > there is this gem now > http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/ > 24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very difficult >> to get the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to be very biased >> even here over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ media in USA is biased, >> too. >> >> E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election where it >> was clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is unthinkable >> here. It would be the one point which would dominate the discussion and >> would make him unvotable here. Your media seemed to move the discussion >> away from this fact and relativated his guilty to make him votable. >> >> Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic which is >> minor at best but was discussed the whole time. >> >> I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get reelected if >> media helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a problem >> than starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart would find 100 >> reasons why this person has to die and would find other topics to report. >> >> >> >> >> >> Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For sure you >> have a problem. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >> /sarcasm >> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05 >> *An:* [email protected] >> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >> >> >> >> Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to effectively >> shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current environment. >> Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA responses, live >> streamed events, and one on one interviews (and yes...twitter) the press >> really is the dialup internet method of getting information. We know more >> in real time then the press could ever package up and present. The current >> mindset of media in press conferences is that of militants (both sides of >> the media isle) and there is zero professionalism from either one. Neither >> really gives a damn what the answer is anyway, theyre going to report >> whatever their preconceived response was either way. >> >> >> >> Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target? >> >> >> >> Answer: Yes >> >> >> >> CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100 ISIS >> fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that those who >> would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the >> transition of power. >> >> >> >> Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict day >> before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a tumultuous >> time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory response. >> >> >> >> Had the same attack been authorized today: >> >> >> >> CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top >> military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify >> there were no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War crime >> charges possible? >> >> >> >> Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of 100 >> ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of ISIS >> surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed by the >> first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What an >> amazing public speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or friend's >> uncle or something who did too much meth? You know how they start out with >> one sentence and then before you know it they have told fifteen other >> stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever do??? We have >> four years of that to look forward to. Just watch the full speech at the >> CIA, you will see what I mean. Or don't....save yourself the pain. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Can we talk about politics yet? :P >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
