I started reading this: http://www.justfacts.com/
Some of the statistics really rocked my socks.
------ Original Message ------
From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: 1/22/2017 1:05:27 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to
effectively shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current
environment. Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA
responses, live streamed events, and one on one interviews (and
yes...twitter) the press really is the dialup internet method of
getting information. We know more in real time then the press could
ever package up and present. The current mindset of media in press
conferences is that of militants (both sides of the media isle) and
there is zero professionalism from either one. Neither really gives a
damn what the answer is anyway, theyre going to report whatever their
preconceived response was either way.
Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target?
Answer: Yes
CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100
ISIS fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that
those who would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even
during the transition of power.
Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict day
before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a
tumultuous time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory
response.
Had the same attack been authorized today:
CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top
military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to
verify there were no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead.
War crime charges possible?
Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of 100
ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of ISIS
surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed by
the first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What
an amazing public speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or
friend's uncle or something who did too much meth? You know how they
start out with one sentence and then before you know it they have told
fifteen other stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever
do??? We have four years of that to look forward to. Just watch the
full speech at the CIA, you will see what I mean. Or don't....save
yourself the pain.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
wrote:
Can we talk about politics yet? :P
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
