Do some fact checking and research on that site :)
On Jan 22, 2017 12:22 PM, "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]> wrote: > I started reading this: http://www.justfacts.com/ > Some of the statistics really rocked my socks. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: 1/22/2017 1:05:27 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? > > Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to effectively > shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current environment. > Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA responses, live > streamed events, and one on one interviews (and yes...twitter) the press > really is the dialup internet method of getting information. We know more > in real time then the press could ever package up and present. The current > mindset of media in press conferences is that of militants (both sides of > the media isle) and there is zero professionalism from either one. Neither > really gives a damn what the answer is anyway, theyre going to report > whatever their preconceived response was either way. > > Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target? > > Answer: Yes > > CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100 ISIS > fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that those who > would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the > transition of power. > > Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict day > before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a tumultuous > time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory response. > > Had the same attack been authorized today: > > CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top military > officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify there were > no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War crime charges > possible? > > Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of 100 > ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of ISIS > surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives. > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed by the >> first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What an >> amazing public speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or friend's >> uncle or something who did too much meth? You know how they start out with >> one sentence and then before you know it they have told fifteen other >> stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever do??? We have >> four years of that to look forward to. Just watch the full speech at the >> CIA, you will see what I mean. Or don't....save yourself the pain. >> >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Can we talk about politics yet? :P >>> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > >
