Yeah like 1.5Gbps aggregate real throughput on a pair g.fast.  :-)

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:29 AM Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:

> On short loops, VDSL2 can go up to 200 - 300 megabit. v.fast and it's
> derivatives should be able to approach gig. That's short loops, though.
> MDU, individual city blocks, etc.
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Sent: *Wednesday, February 1, 2017 8:20:48 AM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] CenturyLink installing these
>
> We see up to 50 Mbps on Calix VDSL2 on the shorter loops.  That case looks
> like it could be the v.fast box too.  They have one that looks like that
> and they claim up to 200 Mbps on shorter loops for that technology.
>
> *From:* Josh Reynolds
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 31, 2017 10:34 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] CenturyLink installing these
>
> One would suspect a calix e7-2 or e7-20 (2Tbps backplane, 100Gbps link to
> each line card). I don't think you can even feed those by anything short of
> at least a gig ethernet circuit. I never really tried on any of the E7-2s
> I've used in the past though :)
>
> On Jan 31, 2017 11:29 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, do  you know how are they feeding these shelves?
>
> I know that in at least one case a couple of years ago, Qwest was feeding
> an entire neighborhood on I think 4 T1's.
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Darin Steffl <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Exactly. Calix VDSL2 Remote DSLAM. These are the result of CAF funding
> from Govt. to provide minimum 10/1 Mbps speeds to the census blocks they
> took funding for.
>
> If Centurylink had crappy or no DSL in these areas before, expect them to
> be able to offer somewhat functional to excellent DSL speeds to customers
> in range of these remote DSLAMs. For really close customers, they may see
> up to 40/1 Mbps speeds.
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Carl Peterson <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
> As someone already said, its clearly and E3.
> https://www.calix.com/systems/e-series/e3-e5-dsl.html
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:18 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Regen would be my guess.
>
> On 1/31/2017 2:45 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote:
>
> it got fiber ran into it for remote dslam to provide customers vdsl2 along
> that route.
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: "Carl Peterson" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Date: 01/31/17 03:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CenturyLink installing these
>
> Calix.  I'd guess G.Fast
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Josh Corson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know what these are? They are popping up on fairly rural
> areas of our coverage areas and on the state highways.
>
> Thanks
> <mime-attachment.txt>
> <image1.JPG>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Carl Peterson
>
> *PORT NETWORKS*
>
> 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553
>
> Baltimore, MD 21202
>
> (410) 637-3707 <%28410%29%20637-3707>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Darin Steffl
> Minnesota WiFi
> www.mnwifi.com
> 507-634-WiFi
> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
>   <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>
>

Reply via email to