Convoluted configuration, can be buggy, very sensitive to interference, etc.

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Philip Rankin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Adam,
>
> Curious about your issues with Wimax?  What did you use for base stations?
>
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We still have it, yes.  Transitioning to LTE.
>> If you like-hated wimax, then you'll like-hate LTE even more.
>>
>> If you loved Wimax, then I don't think we can be friends.
>>
>>
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Philip Rankin" <[email protected]>
>> To: "af" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: 4/7/2017 1:56:26 PM
>> Subject: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
>>
>> Is anyone still operating 3.65 Wimax?
>>
>> Has any other technology/wireless protocol come along that can compete
>> with Wimax's superior nLos capability?  At any other bands?  I have no
>> interest in 900.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any feedback!
>>
>> --
>> Philip J. Rankin
>> Wireless Telecommunications Services
>> PO Box 24
>> Pittsburg, KS  66762
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Philip J. Rankin
> Wireless Telecommunications Services
> PO Box 24
> Pittsburg, KS  66762
>

Reply via email to