I would really like to compare side by side, but I haven't.
I think someone at Cambium suggested that 450 would give you more
throughput when it worked, but they believed LTE would work in more
places. I can't remember who that was.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Josh Baird" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: 4/7/2017 3:23:58 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
450 isn't Wimax.. so, it's really not the same.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Matt <[email protected]>
wrote:
How does it stack up to 450 to anyone who has done both?
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
wrote:
> We still have it, yes. Transitioning to LTE.
> If you like-hated wimax, then you'll like-hate LTE even more.
>
> If you loved Wimax, then I don't think we can be friends.
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Philip Rankin" <[email protected]>
> To: "af" <[email protected]>
> Sent: 4/7/2017 1:56:26 PM
> Subject: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
>
> Is anyone still operating 3.65 Wimax?
>
> Has any other technology/wireless protocol come along that can
compete with
> Wimax's superior nLos capability? At any other bands? I have no
interest
> in 900.
>
> Thanks in advance for any feedback!
>
> --
> Philip J. Rankin
> Wireless Telecommunications Services
> PO Box 24
> Pittsburg, KS 66762
