Yes, 450 is a different animal. Don't expect to 450 to have particularly good NLOS capabilities, or work well with crummy signal like wimax or lte does. There's nothing special about the 3.65ghz band other than a little higher TX power and lower noise, so realistically, 3.65ghz 450 does a bit worse NLOS than 2.4ghz 450 and a bit better than 5ghz 450... pretty much just what you'd expect. If everything has clear LOS and good signals, 450 will probably outperform LTE (especially once 3.65 450M is out).... NLOS really isn't comparable though.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > 450 isn't Wimax.. so, it's really not the same. > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How does it stack up to 450 to anyone who has done both? >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: >> > We still have it, yes. Transitioning to LTE. >> > If you like-hated wimax, then you'll like-hate LTE even more. >> > >> > If you loved Wimax, then I don't think we can be friends. >> > >> > >> > ------ Original Message ------ >> > From: "Philip Rankin" <[email protected]> >> > To: "af" <[email protected]> >> > Sent: 4/7/2017 1:56:26 PM >> > Subject: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax >> > >> > Is anyone still operating 3.65 Wimax? >> > >> > Has any other technology/wireless protocol come along that can compete >> with >> > Wimax's superior nLos capability? At any other bands? I have no >> interest >> > in 900. >> > >> > Thanks in advance for any feedback! >> > >> > -- >> > Philip J. Rankin >> > Wireless Telecommunications Services >> > PO Box 24 >> > Pittsburg, KS 66762 >> > >
