At a previous employer it was Motorola CAP320. Current employer has a
blend of Alvarion and Telrad BS's.
Wimax likes:
Works with the crummy signal you get through some trees.
Wimax hates:
Too numerous to list. I wrote one vendor several pages of
complaints. The equipment was always buggy. Features important to me
were never there. Performance was never that great either.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Philip Rankin" <[email protected]>
To: "af" <[email protected]>
Sent: 4/7/2017 2:21:01 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
Hi Adam,
Curious about your issues with Wimax? What did you use for base
stations?
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
wrote:
We still have it, yes. Transitioning to LTE.
If you like-hated wimax, then you'll like-hate LTE even more.
If you loved Wimax, then I don't think we can be friends.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Philip Rankin" <[email protected]>
To: "af" <[email protected]>
Sent: 4/7/2017 1:56:26 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] 3.65 Wimax
Is anyone still operating 3.65 Wimax?
Has any other technology/wireless protocol come along that can
compete with Wimax's superior nLos capability? At any other bands?
I have no interest in 900.
Thanks in advance for any feedback!
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
