Dyess? On Apr 13, 2017 8:31 AM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Years ago wet maintained a link with that equipment. When they moved an > end wet ended up throwing it away if I remember right. Maybe I am thinking > of different gear. > > On site at an AFB today at the "core master site". No pictures allowed > though Jaime. Sorry. This is a pretty small core so not that impressive > anyway. No din rail. > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017, 7:55 AM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> No we did not sweep line or run PIM tests. The outfit they used before >> I was called to check for in-band interference was supposed to do all that >> work. I offered my services and hope to get some work. Big difference >> looking for sub 200khz wide in-band signals in MAS and STL world compared​ >> to 20 to 80MHz common to WISP world. Some HD STL links use 512Kbps....My >> old RS scanner helped distinguishing between STL and MAS ....Found 949.500 >> and 949.875 STL feeds not on their FCC list...Two Christian radio stations. >> Amen >> >> On Apr 12, 2017 11:16 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Are you sure he is an rf guy? He doesn't seem like one. Did you sweep >>> the line to prove it was bad orreplace it and measure the difference? Just >>> wondering, not doubting because it doesn't "look" bad. >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017, 10:35 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Got hired to help station RF guy with suspected >>>> interference....950.00MHz 7.1 mile link using Scala PR-18 reflectors on >>>> each end.... Signal should be in the -50s but they were getting >>>> -90dBm...Check alignment...Good, checked cabling and connectors on TX side >>>> on ground level, good.... Drove up to Lower Comanche site on >>>> mountain....Found a splitter with a pigtail not connected to anything..2nd >>>> picture, and old bad cable 3rd picture....Will replace cable and antenna >>>> this week. >>>> >>>
