No, speaking about philosophy that probably cannot be confirmed with our 
current knowledge.  

Cosmologists have a proof with respect to locality that does open the door to a 
God.  

Kinda like the double slit vs the pilot wave, the more you know the more you 
discover that you don’t know.  
Margarine vs butter...

Just as I cannot prove the positive, yet, nobody can prove that God does not 
exist or that what makes us who we are does not survive death.  You cannot 
prove a negative in complex cases.  

Something caused  Steve Jobs’ last words to be: “Oh Wow, Oh Wow, Oh Wow”.

From: Jeremy 
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 10:17 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Pissed off PhD

I just think it is funny that you are speaking about religion as if it can be 
confirmed with the scientific method.  

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

  I told him that a shrewd person hedges their bets.  I sure do not want to 
step into a possible new existence with a God pissed off at me.  Costs nothing 
and the potential upside is huge.  Better than buying a lottery ticket.    

  From: Jaime Solorza 
  Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 9:36 AM
  To: Animal Farm 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Pissed off PhD

  shoot him this one...."I know there ain't no heaven. but I PRAY there is no 
HELL."

  Jaime Solorza 
  Wireless Systems Architect
  915-861-1390

  On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

    This professor and I have been going for 24 hours now.  He quickly dropped 
to taunts like “have your dead son do something” or pray to god to cure all 
amputees.  Odd crap like that.  

    He guy is 62 year old and throws in a “you lose” and “reality check” with 
every posting.  I am trying to asking for definitions of things he says like 
reality, truth, integrity etc.  He does not want to do anything but say how 
dishonest I am and  how repugnant, dishonest, and disgusting all religions are 
and to make unkind comments about my “dead son”. 

    It  is kinda fun playing defense on an increasingly vitriolic thread.  I 
really got him wound up.  Must be sad in his reality.



    From: Gino A. Villarini 
    Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 6:20 AM
    To: [email protected] 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Pissed off PhD

    I have always had this notion that what we understand as our universe a 
quark of someone else universe… 

    From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
    Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
    Date: Saturday, April 29, 2017 at 7:01 AM
    To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Pissed off PhD


    I had an astronomy professor in college and we got to the part where we 
talked about the
    theories on how the universe was created. Obviously the one that has the 
most "compelling
    concrete evidence" is the big bang theory. So we are told that the universe 
started with 
    hydrogen and helium..... then something happened..... (we still have no 
clue what happened
    in that first billionth of a second) and then everything was created.

    The bible tells us in the beginning there was God and darkness.... then 
something
    happened.... and then there was light.

    So my professor pointed out that both science and religion both start with 
a premise that
    something existed out of nothing and that then something else happened and 
here we are.
    So they could both be right and they could both be wrong. Science doesn't 
tell us where
    the helium and hydrogen came from and religion doesn't tell us where God 
came from.

    Sort of link someone saying, "How do you become a millionaire?" And you 
respond,
    "Well, first get 1 million dollars."




          Gino A. Villarini
         
          President 
          Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 



    On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: 


      No, debate and the scientific method is OK.  

      From: Josh Reynolds 
      Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 12:51 PM
      To: [email protected] 
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Pissed off PhD

      So we've cut out politics, but religion is ok?


      - Josh

      On Apr 28, 2017 1:42 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

        This guy wrote an op ed piece in the Salt Lake Tribune today 
criticizing a
        doctor for claiming that divine intervention saved his wife's life, and 
the
        doctor had the temerity to make this announcement on earth day.  So Mr. 
PhD
        had to take him to task in the news paper.

        I looked up the guys email address and sent him the note (at the bottom 
of
        the thread).  Not sure if I will get any further replies but I did have 
some
        fun this morning...

        -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]
        Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 12:35 PM
        To: Gregory Arthur Clark
        Subject: Re: Letter in the tribune

        So odd and unexpected.

        A truth seeker that resorts insulting someone that disagrees and then 
slams
        the door?
        Is that part of the scientific method?

        Personally, I prefer my pet theories to be disproved so I can continue 
the
        search.

        (BTW, countless anecdotal beyond the veil stories that reveal previously
        unknown information.  But it seems your search for truth in that 
direction
        is clearly halted. )

        See you in 150 years mate!

        -----Original Message----- From: Gregory Arthur Clark
        Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 12:28 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: Letter in the tribune

        Replies below.

        -----Original Message-----
        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
        Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 12:04 PM
        To: Gregory Arthur Clark <[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: Letter in the tribune

        Hmmm, I note some emotion there.

        Odd indeed that you are so worked up when if you parse what I wrote, I 
was
        not conveying any information about my beliefs in anything.  Nor was I
        defending at all what Daniels said.  I don't.

        Odd that you seem to immediately judge me as a dishonest person.
        ---------------
        GC: Curious that you object to my inferences while making so many of 
your
        own.  Your irrelevant ad-homs are telling and typical.

        ========

        Just simply pointing out that it is difficult to prove that something 
does
        not exist.
        You seem to want to debate.  I do know stats and null hypothesis 
analysis, I
        am educated.  I am an engineer.
        ----
        GC: Some educated people still tout nonsense.  Your opening
        proving-a-negative trope explicitly wrt religion reflects ignorance,
        trolling, or both. Lose-lose-lose.

        ==========
        Just teasing a bit.  You seem to want to reject even the possibility 
that
        some form of us will exist in 150 years such that we can communicate 
with
        each other.
        ----
        GC: As Hitch says, that which can be asserted without evidence can be
        dismissed without evidence. But it's worse than that.  Psychics are 
frauds,
        as are all who claim to relay or receive messages from beyond the veil.
        There is compelling concrete evidence that, when put to the test,
        consciousness does not exist without brain function.

        • Clark, G.A. “Science doesn’t support life after death claims.” Guest
        commentary. Standard-Examiner, October 22, 2014 (on-line); October 24
        (print).
        Those who return from beyond the veil never tell us anything they 
couldn’t
        have said without going anywhere at all. There is no demonstrable 
awareness
        after brain shutdown. That’s what this scientific study actually
        shows--despite trumpeted claims otherwise by the popular press.
        
http://www.standard.net/Guest-Commentary/2014/10/26/Science-doesn-t-support-life-after-death-claims.html

        =============================
        I don't reject that idea at all, I hope for it.

        GC: Your inabilities are clearly stated and understood.  But not 
respected.

        ==============
        If it doesn't happen I will never know.  But if it does, expect a visit!

        Cheers,
        Chuck

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Gregory Arthur Clark
        Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 11:56 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: Letter in the tribune

        Thanks for your input, Chuck.  My replies are interdigitated below.

        -----Original Message-----
        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
        Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:46 AM
        To: Gregory Arthur Clark <[email protected]>
        Subject: Letter in the tribune

        Dr. Clark,

        “Because when it comes to the real world, science works. Religion 
doesn’t.”

        You can prove a negative?  Just because you have not yet found the knobs
        that control how religion works, does not mean they do not exist.
        ----
        GC:  From a pure epistemological standpoint, science and empirical 
evidence
        and inductive logic can't "prove" anything, positive or negative, with 
100%
        certainty.  So what? Science deals with probabilities. That's why 
scientific
        journals indicate the probabilities associated with rejecting the null
        hypothesis.

        What science can do is to disconfirm hypotheses beyond a reasonable 
doubt.
        Absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence -- if the evidence 
should
        be there, but repeatedly and reproducibly is not. Science often *does*
        reject negatives.  So do we as people. We reject the hypothesis that 
saying
        "abracadabra" cures all cancers, immediately.  We reject the hypothesis 
that
        Godzilla just devoured all of Salt Lake City.  We can reject the God
        hypothesis with much the same certainty as we reject the God hypothesis.

        Stop making dishonest, special-pleading exceptions for God.

        =============
        I think you would agree that the placebo effect is a real thing.  So in 
the
        case where religion triggers the placebo effect religion arguably does 
work.
        ---
        GC: Don't move the goal posts.  Of course thinking and prayer and all 
sorts
        of mental activities can affect *the person doing them*. But it's
        self-evident and explicit that my op-ed refers to intercessory prayer
        regarding the *external physical world.*  Praying to God has the same 
effect
        on the external physical world as praying to horse manure: None.

        ==========
        Not trying to be a troll, I am serious.  I think that there is some 
chance
        that we do live in “the matrix” or perhaps our universe is contained in 
a
        small charm dangling from the collar of a cat.

        Will make you a wager, in 150 years if some of my ideas are correct, I 
will
        look you up and you will owe me the equivalent of a cosmic cup of 
coffee.
        Deal?
        ---
        GC: I call your bluff. Why wait?
        Pray, now, that God will heal all adult human amputees by re-growing 
their
        missing limbs.  It's in the power of an omnipotent God to do so.
        And yet you know and I know and Professor Daniels knows and essentially
        *every* sane adult  knows that you will fail.
        Stop making excuses for God.   God "answers" prayers the same way that 
horse
        manure "answers" prayers: Not at all.
        Religion is ridiculous, repugnant, and deeply dishonest.  Stop lying to
        yourself.  And to others.

        ========
        Over and out,
        Greg
        ============
        Warm Regards,
        Chuck McCown




Reply via email to