What size channel? Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell [email protected]
> On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:51 PM, David Coudron <[email protected]> > wrote: > > We have what I believe is a similar need. We have a number of customers > that have large farmyards and want coverage in outbuildings. These are too > far for ethernet runs, so we have been using Ubiquiti Nanostations as PTP > links because they are cheap. I see that the ePMPs get close to the same > price point as the larger Nanostations and we are wondering if they are a > better option. Does anyone have experience with both and some perspective > which is a better option for PTP links that are less than a mile and need 25 > -50 Mbps? > > Thanks, > > David Coudron > [email protected] | Mobile: 612-991-7474 > > Advantenon, Inc. <image001.jpg> <image002.jpg> <image003.jpg> > <image004.jpg> > [email protected] | 3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN 55447 > | www.advantenon.com | Phone: 800-704-4720 | Local: 612-454-1545 > > <image005.jpg> > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - Lists > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:26 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 vs Force200 > > I'd use a couple of Force 200s in PTP mode. > > Jeff Broadwick > ConVergence Technologies, Inc. > 312-205-2519 Office > 574-220-7826 Cell > [email protected] > > On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am looking for an inexpensive very low bandwidth replacement for a PTP400. > I need less than a meg so throughput isn't an issue. I see they are both > 5,10,20, and 40 MHz channel widths which is good. I can set it on 5MHz and > get more than what I need and hopefully stay out of everyone else's way. > > Unless I am looking at the wrong SKU it looks like the 110 is almost twice as > much. Maybe I am not looking at complete kits or something? > > From those that have used them, what do you think?
