For those barn to house PTP links we've been doing Nanostations. We use a different band than the rx radio for the Internet service (ie Force200 for Internet, nsm2 ptp link).
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists <[email protected]> wrote: > What size channel? > > Jeff Broadwick > ConVergence Technologies, Inc. > 312-205-2519 <(312)%20205-2519> Office > 574-220-7826 <(574)%20220-7826> Cell > [email protected] > > On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:51 PM, David Coudron <[email protected]> > wrote: > > We have what I believe is a similar need. We have a number of customers > that have large farmyards and want coverage in outbuildings. These are > too far for ethernet runs, so we have been using Ubiquiti Nanostations as > PTP links because they are cheap. I see that the ePMPs get close to the > same price point as the larger Nanostations and we are wondering if they > are a better option. Does anyone have experience with both and some > perspective which is a better option for PTP links that are less than a > mile and need 25 -50 Mbps? > > > Thanks, > > > > *David Coudron* > > [email protected] | *Mobile: *612-991-7474 <(612)%20991-7474> > > > > *Advantenon, Inc. * <image001.jpg> > <http://www.linkedin.com/company/Advantenon> <image002.jpg> > <http://www.twitter.com/Advantenon> <image003.jpg> > <http://www.facebook.com/Advantenon> <image004.jpg> > <http://blog.advantenon.com/> > > [email protected] | 3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN > 55447 | www.advantenon.com | *Phone:* 800-704-4720 <(800)%20704-4720> > | *Local: *612-454-1545 <(612)%20454-1545> > > > > <image005.jpg> > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Jeff Broadwick - Lists > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:26 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Force110 vs Force200 > > > > I'd use a couple of Force 200s in PTP mode. > > Jeff Broadwick > > ConVergence Technologies, Inc. > > 312-205-2519 <(312)%20205-2519> Office > > 574-220-7826 <(574)%20220-7826> Cell > > [email protected] > > > On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I am looking for an inexpensive very low bandwidth replacement for a > PTP400. I need less than a meg so throughput isn't an issue. I see they are > both 5,10,20, and 40 MHz channel widths which is good. I can set it on 5MHz > and get more than what I need and hopefully stay out of everyone else's way. > > > > Unless I am looking at the wrong SKU it looks like the 110 is almost twice > as much. Maybe I am not looking at complete kits or something? > > > > From those that have used them, what do you think? > >
