Yeah, I'm not sure why you would ever use 2.4ghz, if you don't have to. Much better to just use a different part of the 5ghz band, in my opinion... this sort of thing is usually a perfect fit for the DFS band.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > 20 MHz * 4 bits perfect would be 80 megs....best case scenario. > > If you need to carry 100 megs, do a Force 180 in DFS with 40 MHz > channels. You can have a shop guy program a bunch of pairs/do a backup > ready to go for the installers. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:45 AM, David Coudron < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Right, our thought process was run the APs in the 5GHz band and use the >> Nanostation 2s. That has seemed to work well, but just wondering if >> anyone else had another suggestion. Sounds like we will stay with this. >> We typically run the fattest channel we can on these relay radios. We >> will eventually be offering 100 Mbps plans, not sure if the Nanostations >> will be able to do this. We will be testing that out this week. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> *David Coudron* >> >> [email protected] | *Mobile: *612-991-7474 >> <(612)%20991-7474> >> >> >> >> *Advantenon, Inc. * [image: >> cid:[email protected]] >> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/Advantenon> [image: >> cid:[email protected]] <http://www.twitter.com/Advantenon> >> [image: >> cid:[email protected]] <http://www.facebook.com/Advantenon> >> [image: cid:[email protected]] >> <http://blog.advantenon.com/> >> >> [email protected] | 3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN >> 55447 | www.advantenon.com | *Phone:* 800-704-4720 <(800)%20704-4720> >> | *Local: *612-454-1545 <(612)%20454-1545> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman >> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 28, 2017 8:43 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Force110 vs Force200 >> >> >> >> For those barn to house PTP links we've been doing Nanostations. We use >> a different band than the rx radio for the Internet service (ie Force200 >> for Internet, nsm2 ptp link). >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> What size channel? >> >> Jeff Broadwick >> >> ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >> >> 312-205-2519 <(312)%20205-2519> Office >> >> 574-220-7826 <(574)%20220-7826> Cell >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:51 PM, David Coudron <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> We have what I believe is a similar need. We have a number of customers >> that have large farmyards and want coverage in outbuildings. These are >> too far for ethernet runs, so we have been using Ubiquiti Nanostations as >> PTP links because they are cheap. I see that the ePMPs get close to the >> same price point as the larger Nanostations and we are wondering if they >> are a better option. Does anyone have experience with both and some >> perspective which is a better option for PTP links that are less than a >> mile and need 25 -50 Mbps? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> *David Coudron* >> >> [email protected] | *Mobile: *612-991-7474 >> <(612)%20991-7474> >> >> >> >> *Advantenon, Inc. * <image001.jpg> >> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/Advantenon> <image002.jpg> >> <http://www.twitter.com/Advantenon> <image003.jpg> >> <http://www.facebook.com/Advantenon> <image004.jpg> >> <http://blog.advantenon.com/> >> >> [email protected] | 3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN >> 55447 | www.advantenon.com | *Phone:* 800-704-4720 <(800)%20704-4720> >> | *Local: *612-454-1545 <(612)%20454-1545> >> >> >> >> <image005.jpg> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Jeff Broadwick - Lists >> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:26 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Force110 vs Force200 >> >> >> >> I'd use a couple of Force 200s in PTP mode. >> >> Jeff Broadwick >> >> ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >> >> 312-205-2519 <(312)%20205-2519> Office >> >> 574-220-7826 <(574)%20220-7826> Cell >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I am looking for an inexpensive very low bandwidth replacement for a >> PTP400. I need less than a meg so throughput isn't an issue. I see they are >> both 5,10,20, and 40 MHz channel widths which is good. I can set it on 5MHz >> and get more than what I need and hopefully stay out of everyone else's way. >> >> >> >> Unless I am looking at the wrong SKU it looks like the 110 is almost >> twice as much. Maybe I am not looking at complete kits or something? >> >> >> >> From those that have used them, what do you think? >> >> >> > >
